Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30986142›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2019

Retrieval-Based Word Learning in Young Typically Developing Children and Children With Developmental Language Disorder I: The Benefits of Repeated Retrieval.

Laurence B Leonard, Jeffrey Karpicke, Patricia Deevy, Christine Weber, Sharon Christ, Eileen Haebig, Sofía Souto, Justin B Kueser, Windi Krok

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05512000 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Increasing Word Learning Efficiency in Children Who Are Deaf and Hard of Hearing Through Retrieval Practice

TypeinterventionalSponsorVanderbilt University Medical CenterRan2023 to 2025Enrolled13ConditionsHearing Loss, Language ImpairmentArmsFeedback with massed trials, Feedback with spaced trials, No feedback with massed trials, No feedback with spaced trials
NCT06466876 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Retrieval-Based Word Learning in Autism Spectrum Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorLouisiana State University and A&M CollegeRan2023 to 2026Enrolled64ConditionsAutism Spectrum DisorderArmsretrieval-based word learning
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Direct Instruction Improves Word Learning for Children With Developmental Language Disorder.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laurence B LeonardDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Jeffrey KarpickeDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Patricia DeevyDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Christine WeberDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Sharon ChristDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Eileen HaebigDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.
Sofía SoutoDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Butler University, Indianapolis, IN.
Justin B KueserDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Windi KrokDepartment of Speech Language and Hearing Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC.

Funding

Retrieval-Based Word Learning in Specific Language ImpairmentR01DC014708 · NIDCD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey Karpicke · 2016 to 2026
$5.8M
Diversity SupplementT32DC000030 · NIDCD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY WEST LAFAYETTE · PI Arielle Borovsky, Preeti M. Sivasankar · 1991 to 2026
$5.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014708NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Scholars have long noted that retention improves significantly when learners frequently test themselves on the new material rather than engage in continuous study with no intermittent testing. In this study, we apply the notion of repeated testing or retrieval to the process of word learning in preschool-age children with and without developmental language disorder (DLD). Method Novel words and their meanings were taught to 10 children with DLD and 10 typically developing (TD) children matched on age (DLD, M = 63.4 months; TD, M = 63.2 months). Recall was assessed immediately after the 2nd learning session and then again 1 week later. Results Both groups showed better retention when they had attempted to retrieve the words during the learning period than when they had simply listened to and studied the words paired with their referents. Relative to their TD peers, the children with DLD seemed to be weaker in their encoding, but these children's retention over a 1-week period was indistinguishable from that of their age mates. Conclusion Word learning activities that include opportunities for repeated retrieval appear to significantly benefit retention relative to more traditional word learning activities. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.7927046.

Indexed as

Child LanguageCase-Control StudiesChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansLanguage Development DisordersLanguage TestsMaleMental RecallRepetition PrimingVerbal Learning

Identifiers

PMID30986142
PMCPMC6802889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.