Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30985913›Full record

ArticleCancer2019

Ambulatory status after surgical and nonsurgical treatment for spinal metastasis.

Andrew J Schoenfeld, Elena Losina, Marco L Ferrone, Joseph H Schwab, John H Chi, Justin A Blucher, Genevieve S Silva, Angela T Chen, Mitchel B Harris, James D Kang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Evaluating ambulatory function as an outcome following treatment for spinal metastases: a systematic review.The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. A three-dimensional finite element-based biomechanical properties analysis of the 10th thoracic vertebra invaded by bone metastases for clinical procedure optimization.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Regional variability and economic impact on surgical practices for metastatic spinal disease in Europe - a survey on spine surgeons.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Randomized controlled trials and high-intensity spine surgery.The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2020
    Article
  17. Patient experiences of decision-making in the treatment of spinal metastases: a qualitative study.The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2020
    Article
  18. Outcomes of surgical treatments of spinal metastases: a prospective study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Andrew J SchoenfeldDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-3691-1215
Elena LosinaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Marco L FerroneDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Joseph H SchwabDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
John H ChiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Justin A BlucherDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Genevieve S SilvaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Angela T ChenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mitchel B HarrisDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
James D KangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jeffrey N KatzDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

VERITY: Value and Evidence in Rheumatology using bioInformaTics, and advanced analYticsP30AR072577 · NIAMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Elena Losina · 2017 to 2026
$9.8M
Patient Oriented Research and Mentoring Program in OrthopedicsK24AR057827 · NIAMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI LOSINA, ELENA · 2010 to 2019
$1.7M
Optimizing Surgical Interventions for Patients with Spinal Metastases: A Mixed-Methods StudyK23AR071464 · NIAMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SCHOENFELD, ANDREW · 2017 to 2021
$890k
NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR071464NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR057827NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR072577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDecisions for operative or nonoperative management remain challenging for patients with spinal metastases, especially when life expectancy and quality of life are not easily predicted. This study evaluated the effects of operative and nonoperative management on maintenance of ambulatory function and survival for patients treated for spinal metastases.

methodsPropensity matching was used to yield an analytic sample in which operatively and nonoperatively treated patients were similar with respect to key baseline covariates. The study included patients treated for spinal metastases between 2005 and 2017 who were 40 to 80 years old, were independent ambulators at presentation, and had fewer than 5 medical comorbidities. It evaluated the influence of operative care and nonoperative care on ambulatory function 6 months after presentation as the primary outcome. Survival at 6 months and survival at 1 year were secondary outcomes.

resultsNine hundred twenty-nine individuals eligible for inclusion were identified, with 402 (201 operative patients and 201 nonoperative patients) retained after propensity score matching. Patients treated operatively had a lower likelihood than those treated nonoperatively of being nonambulatory 6 months after presentation (3% vs 16%; relative risk [RR], 0.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06-0.46) as well as a reduced risk of 6-month mortality (20% vs 29%; RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.49-0.98).

conclusionsThese results indicate that in a group of patients with similar demographic and clinical characteristics, those treated operatively were less likely to lose ambulatory function 6 months after presentation than those managed nonoperatively. For patients with spinal metastases, our data can be incorporated into discussions about the treatments that align best with patients' preferences regarding surgical risk, mortality, and ambulatory status.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisSpinal NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeWalkingambulatory functionpropensity score matchingspinal metastasessurgical managementsurvival

Identifiers

PMID30985913
PMCPMC6625859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.