ArticleJAMA neurology2019
Association of Closed-Loop Brain Stimulation Neurophysiological Features With Seizure Control Among Patients With Focal Epilepsy.
Article in JAMA neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
77 citing papers in PubMed, 163 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early assessment of responsive neurostimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy in China: A multicenter, self-controlled study.Chinese medical journal · 2025Trial
- Clusters in Thalamic iEEG Spectral Features Reveal Sleep/Wake Differences Over Time.Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society · 2026Article
- Nucleus-specific thalamic involvement in seizure networks differentiates neuromodulation outcomes.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Virtual Responsive Neurostimulation Implantation: From Intracranial Connectivity to Optimized Lead Placement.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Brain-Computer Interfaces: The Dawn of a New Era in Disease Treatment.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2026Review
- Neuronal silence as a predictive biomarker and target for epileptic seizures suppression.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Epilepsy: Molecular Pathogenesis and Emerging Therapies.MedComm · 2026Review
- Passive neuromodulation: an energy-driven mechanism for closed-loop suppression of epileptic seizures.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- sEEG-guided responsive neurostimulation to treat neocortical epilepsy: A multicenter retrospective study of the efficacy and safety of depth electrode-mediated neuromodulation.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
- Electrographic cue-reactivity co-localizes with accumbens deep brain stimulation in a case of opioid use disorder.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Buckling-Resistant and Trace-Stacked (BRATS) Design Enables Aid-Free Implantation of Flexible Multielectrode Array with Minimized Inflammatory Tissue Response.Advanced functional materials · 2026Article
- The Palliative Nature of Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery and Our Procedures.Pediatric neurosurgery · 2026Review
- Review
- Potential for Therapeutic Alteration of the Underlying Biology of Epilepsy.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Individualized Frequency-Dependent Stimulation to the Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus May Improve Antiepileptic Effects in Patients With Focal Epilepsy.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
- Simultaneous craniotomy for resection and placement of responsive neurostimulation for treatment of medically refractory epilepsy: illustrative cases.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2025Article
- The Role of Neuroinflammation and Network Anomalies in Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.Neuroscience bulletin · 2025Review
- The thalamus: Structure, function, and neurotherapeutics.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025Review
- State-dependent effects of responsive neurostimulation depend on seizure localization.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Interictal short-term high-frequency cortical stimulation modulates epileptogenic zone and distributed network.Brain communications · 2025Article
17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: A bidirectional brain-computer interface that performs neurostimulation has been shown to improve seizure control in patients with refractory epilepsy, but the therapeutic mechanism is unknown. Objective: To investigate whether electrographic effects of responsive neurostimulation (RNS), identified in electrocorticographic (ECOG) recordings from the device, are associated with patient outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective review of ECOG recordings and accompanying clinical meta-data from 11 consecutive patients with focal epilepsy who were implanted with a neurostimulation system between January 28, 2015, and June 6, 2017, with 22 to 112 weeks of follow-up. Recorded ECOG data were obtained from the manufacturer; additional system-generated meta-data, including recording and detection settings, were collected directly from the manufacturer's management system using an in-house, custom-built platform. Electrographic seizure patterns were identified in RNS recordings and evaluated in the time-frequency domain, which was locked to the onset of the seizure pattern. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patterns of electrophysiological modulation were identified and then classified according to their latency of onset in relation to triggered stimulation events. Seizure control after RNS implantation was assessed by 3 main variables: mean frequency of seizure occurrence, estimated mean severity of seizures, and mean duration of seizures. Overall seizure outcomes were evaluated by the extended Personal Impact of Epilepsy Scale questionnaires, a patient-reported outcome measure of 3 domains (seizure characteristics, medication adverse effects, and quality of life), with a range of possible scores from 0 to 300 in which lower scores indicate worse status, and the Engel scale, which comprises 4 classes (I-IV) in which lower numbers indicate greater improvement. Results: Electrocorticographic data from 11 patients (8 female; mean [range] age, 35 [19-65] years; mean [range] duration of epilepsy, 19 [5-37] years) were analyzed. Two main categories of electrophysiological signatures of stimulation-induced modulation of the seizure network were discovered: direct and indirect effects. Direct effects included ictal inhibition and early frequency modulation but were not associated with improved clinical outcomes (odds ratio [OR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.06-7.35; P > .99). Only indirect effects-those occurring remote from triggered stimulation-were associated with improved clinical outcomes (OR, infinity; 95% CI, -infinity to infinity; P = .02). These indirect effects included spontaneous ictal inhibition, frequency modulation, fragmentation, and ictal duration modulation. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that RNS effectiveness may be explained by long-term, stimulation-induced modulation of seizure network activity rather than by direct effects on each detected seizure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.