Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30985861›Full record

Observational studyJAMA internal medicine2019

Assessment of Inpatient Time Allocation Among First-Year Internal Medicine Residents Using Time-Motion Observations.

Krisda H Chaiyachati, Judy A Shea, David A Asch, Manqing Liu, Lisa M Bellini, C Jessica Dine, Alice L Sternberg, Yevgeniy Gitelman, Alyssa M Yeager, Jeremy M Asch and 1 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02274818 (Individualized Comparative Effectiveness of Models Optimizing Patient Safety and Resident Education), which is not on this map. Cited by 64 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02274818 nacompletednot on this map

Individualized Comparative Effectiveness of Models Optimizing Patient Safety and Resident Education (iCOMPARE).

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2015 to 2020Enrolled3,500ConditionsSafety, Education, Medical, SleepArmsFlexible Duty Hour Schedule
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. A systematic review of evidence-based practices for clinical education and health care delivery in the clinical teaching unit.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Streamlining Health Care: Inpatient Dashboard as a User-Centric Solution in EHR Enhancement.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025
    Article
  18. A dataset and benchmark for hospital course summarization with adapted large language models.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Krisda H ChaiyachatiDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Judy A SheaDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
David A AschDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Manqing LiuDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Lisa M BelliniDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
C Jessica DineDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Alice L SternbergDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Yevgeniy GitelmanDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Alyssa M YeagerDepartment of Medicine, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut.
Jeremy M AschDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Sanjay V DesaiDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

ICOMPARE-CCCU01HL125388 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ASCH, DAVID A · 2015 to 2018
$5.7M
iCOMPARE - DCCU01HL126088 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TONASCIA, JAMES A · 2015 to 2018
$3.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL125388NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL126088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The United States spends more than $12 billion annually on graduate medical education. Understanding how residents balance patient care and educational activities may provide insights into how the modern physician workforce is being trained. Objective: To describe how first-year internal medicine residents (interns) allocate time while working on general medicine inpatient services. Design, Setting, and Participants: Direct observational secondary analysis, including 6 US university-affiliated and community-based internal medicine programs in the mid-Atlantic region, of the Comparative Effectiveness of Models Optimizing Patient Safety and Resident Education (iCOMPARE) trial, a cluster-randomized trial comparing different duty-hour policies. A total of 194 weekday shifts were observed and time motion data were collected, sampled by daytime, nighttime, and call shifts in proportion to the distribution of shifts within each program from March 10 through May 31, 2016. Data were analyzed from June 1, 2016, through January 5, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mean time spent in direct and indirect patient care, education, rounds, handoffs, and miscellaneous activities within a 24-hour period and in each of four 6-hour periods (morning, afternoon, evening, and night). Time spent multitasking, simultaneously engaged in combinations of direct patient care, indirect patient care, or education, and in subcategories of indirect patient care were tracked. Results: A total of 80 interns (55% men; mean [SD] age, 28.7 [2.3] years) were observed across 194 shifts, totaling 2173 hours. A mean (SD) of 15.9 (0.7) hours of a 24-hour period (66%) was spent in indirect patient care, mostly interactions with the patient's medical record or documentation (mean [SD], 10.3 [0.7] hours; 43%). A mean (SD) of 3.0 (0.1) hours was spent in direct patient care (13%) and 1.8 (0.3) hours in education (7%). This pattern was consistent across the 4 periods of the day. Direct patient care and education frequently occurred when interns were performing indirect patient care. Multitasking with 2 or more indirect patient care activities occurred for a mean (SD) of 3.8 (0.4) hours (16%) of the day. Conclusions and Relevance: This study's findings suggest that within these US teaching programs, interns spend more time participating in indirect patient care than interacting with patients or in dedicated educational activities. These findings provide an essential baseline measure for future efforts designed to improve the workday structure and experience of internal medicine trainees, without making a judgment on the current allocation of time. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02274818.

Indexed as

Work Schedule ToleranceAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInternal MedicineInternship and ResidencyJob SatisfactionMaleTime and Motion StudiesTime ManagementUnited StatesWorkload

Identifiers

PMID30985861
PMCPMC8462976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.