ArticleMedicine2019
Predictive value of early molecular response for deep molecular response in chronic phase of chronic myeloid leukemia.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Trial
- Matching-adjusted indirect comparison between asciminib and flumatinib as first-line treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia in China.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in chronic myeloid leukemia treated with second-line nilotinib-association of molecular milestones and prognostic scores with deep molecular response: a real-world retrospective cohort study.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2026Article
- Early Molecular Response to Imatinib First-Line Therapy and Predictive Factors of Poor Outcomes for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Côte d'Ivoire.Advances in hematology · 2024Article
- Article
- Mechanisms of Resistance and Implications for Treatment Strategies in Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia.Cancers · 2022Review
- Early molecular response in East African Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukaemia patients treated with Imatinib and barriers to access treatment.Ecancermedicalscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the association of 3- and 6-month BCR-ABL transcript levels on the international scale (BCR-ABL) and other factors with deep molecular response (DMR) achievement in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)-chronic phase (CP) patients receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy.We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 206 patients enrolled in our hospital between January 2010 and July 2018. These patients were initially diagnosed with CML-CP and received imatinib or nilotinib therapy. Early molecular response (EMR) was assessed based on BCR-ABL (IS: on the international scale) transcript level at 3 and 6 months. Potential factors impacting DMR achievement were identified using Cox proportional hazard regression models. The effects of EMR achievement on the cumulative incidence of MR4.0 were investigated via Kaplan-Meier analysis.Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that a BCR-ABL transcript level at 3 and 6 months of TKI therapy was an independent factor for the achievement of MR4.0, which was nevertheless not related to age, gender, Sokal score, hemoglobin level, or white blood cell (WBC) count at the initial time of diagnosis. Patients achieving an EMR (EMR: 3-month BCR-ABL ≤10%, 6-month BCR-ABL <1%) were more likely to reach MR4.0 than patients failing to achieve EMR (P1 <.001, P2 <.001). Patients who had 3-month BCR-ABL ≤1% were more likely to reach MR4.0 than those who had 3-month BCR-ABL of 1% to 10% or >10% (P1 = .001, P2 <.001). Similarly, patients who had 6-month BCR-ABL ≤0.1% were more likely to achieve MR4.0 than those in the 0.1% to 1% and ≥1% groups (P1 <.001, P2 <.001). Also, a higher percentage of patients on nilotinib therapy achieved EMR compared with patients on imatinib therapy (93.3% vs 63.6% on 3-month nilotinib therapy, P = .001; 88.9% vs 59.9% on 6-month nilotinib therapy, P = .004).This study demonstrates that EMR, especially a 3-month BCR-ABL ≤1% and 6-month BCR-ABL ≤0.1%, have predictive value for DMR achievement. In addition, there is a higher percentage of patients receiving nilotinib therapy achieved EMR than that of those receiving imatinib therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.