SynthesisMedicine2019
Evaluation of the adjunctive effect of Xing Nao Jing Injection for viral encephalitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acyclovir Combined with Naloxone in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Pooled it
- Effect of adjuvant treatment with Xiyanping injection on the prognosis of viral encephalitis in children: a multicenter retrospective study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Chinese herbal injections for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A narrative review.Integrative medicine research · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo systematically evaluate the effect and safety of Xing Nao Jing (XNJ) injection as an add-on treatment on the treatment for viral encephalitis (VE).
methodsTrials assessing the adjunctive effectiveness of XNJ injection for VE were searched from 4 electronic databases from inception to October 31, 2018. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Meta-analysis and additional analysis were conducted if data permitted. Trial Sequential Analysis and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) were also performed.
resultsThis review involved 23 trials and 1757 participants, all trials were assessed as having unclear risk of bias. Results from 5 meta-analyses, 13 subgroup meta-analyses, and the single studies showed that based on conventional therapy XNJ injection (0.4-0.6 mL/kg daily for children, 20 mL/day for adults) may have better effect on increasing the numbers of cured patients and decreasing the time of recovery of main symptoms for patients with viral encephalitis. Patients used combination of XNJ injection and conventional therapy had higher cured rate (risk ratio 1.61, 95% confidence interval 1.45-1.80, 19 trials, 1456 participants) and less mortality rate (risk ratio 0.26, 95% confidence interval 0.10-0.71, 9 trials, 595 participants). The average difference of time for fever, conscious, or convulsive recovery was average 2 hours shorter in combination group than in control. No difference was found between children and adults according to the subgroup analysis. Safety of the XNJ injection was failed to evaluate due to the insufficient evidence in this review.
conclusionsThis review found "very low" quality evidence which showed the potential effectiveness of combination of XNJ injection and conventional therapies for VE. Considering the TSA results, conclusion could only be draw on effectiveness of the XNJ injection as add-on treatment for VE patients on increasing the cured rate. Firm conclusion on other outcome measures for effectiveness assessment or safety of XNJ injection could not be draw according to this review due to the insufficient evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.