Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30985664›Full record

ArticleMedicine2019

Factors predicting the colorectal adenoma detection rate in colonoscopic screening of a Chinese population: A prospective study.

Han Wang, Pu Wang, Xiaogang Liu, Liangping Li, Xun Xiao, Peixi Liu, Di Zhang, Yi Li, Guangre Xu, Mengtian Tu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Association study betweenFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Article
  9. Examining the Factors That Affect the Diagnosis of Patients with Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test Results.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Health Belief, Behavior Intention, and Health Behaviors Related to Colorectal Cancer Screening in Taiwan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Han WangDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
Pu WangDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
Xiaogang LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
Liangping LiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
Xun XiaoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
Peixi LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
Di ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
Yi LiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
Guangre XuDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
Mengtian TuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Sichuan Academy of Medical Science & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Yan SongDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer has high incidence and mortality. Early diagnosis could increase patient survival, but early diagnosis has been poor in China for the past decades. The purpose of this study is to assess the polyp detection rate (PDR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR) by colonoscopy in a Chinese population, and to determine the risk factors for adenoma.This prospective study at Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital evaluated patients who underwent colonoscopy in September 2017 to February 2018. Basic information, exact insertion and withdrawal times, PDR, and ADR were assessed. Risk factors for colorectal adenoma in the adenoma-positive and adenoma-negative groups (based on pathology) were assessed by multivariable logistic regression analysis.A total of 1058 procedures with 767 polyps were analyzed. The overall PDR and ADR were 36.96% (391/1058) and 24.67% (261/1058), respectively. Occurrence of adenoma was associated with age, gender, body mass index (BMI), family history of colon cancer, personal history of adenoma, diabetes mellitus, and tobacco use. There was a significant association between withdrawal time and ADR (P < .001). In the multivariable analysis, age (OR = 1.041, 95%CI 1.028-1.055; P < .001), insertion time (OR = 0.999, 95%CI 0.998-1.000; P = .009), withdrawal time (OR = 1.009, 95%CI 1.007-1.011; P < .001), personal history of adenoma (OR = 2.572, 95%CI 1.115-5.932; P = .027), and diabetes mellitus (OR = 2.221, 95%CI 1.084-4.549; P = .029) were risk factors for colorectal adenoma detection.In a Chinese population, ADR increases with age, withdrawal time, a personal history of adenoma, and diabetes. Age, insertion and withdrawal times, and a personal history of adenoma may independently predict colorectal adenoma detection.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyEarly Detection of CancerAdenomaAdultColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID30985664
PMCPMC6485896
OpenAlexW2937690454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.