ArticleMedicine2019
Do routine blood test results help in the diagnosis of spine tumors? A retrospective study of the significance of pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios from 503 spine tumor patients.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of blood cell-based inflammatory markers with gut microbiota and cancer incidence in the Rotterdam study.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Are preoperative complete blood count parameters in peripheral nerve sheath tumors useful diagnostic tools?Joint diseases and related surgery · 2021Article
- Diagnostic and prognostic role of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, platelet/lymphocyte ratio, and lymphocyte/monocyte ratio in patients with osteosarcoma.Joint diseases and related surgery · 2021Article
- The association of innate and adaptive immunity, subclinical atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular disease in the Rotterdam Study: A prospective cohort study.PLoS medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are not fully evaluated for the diagnosis of musculoskeletal tumors, especially spine tumors. The objective of our study was to assess the feasibility of NLR and PLR as indicators for pretreatment diagnosis of spine tumors.Patients who underwent surgical treatment in our hospital for spine tumors were retrospectively analyzed. Blood test results (neutrophil, lymphocyte, and platelet counts) and final pathological results from surgery or biopsy specimen were collected. Spine tumors were divided into 4 groups. Diagnostic values of NLR and PLR were analyzed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC).There were 503 patients included. The average age of all patients was 46.3 years. Age, NLR, and PLR were significantly different between benign and malignant tumors groups (P < .05), and ROC analysis showed that the AUC was 0.704 and 0.637 for NLR and PLR. Age, location, NLR, and PLR were significantly different between primary and nonprimary tumor groups (P < .05), and ROC analysis showed that the AUC was 0.713 and 0.647 for NLR and PLR. Age, location, NLR, and PLR were significantly different between primary benign and primary malignant tumor groups (P < .05), and ROC analysis showed that the AUC was 0.624 and 0.577 for NLR and PLR.Pretreatment NLR and PLR had clinical significance in the identification and pretreatment diagnosis of spine tumors. Additionally, NLR and PLR were significantly different between benign and malignant tumors, primary and nonprimary tumors, and primary benign and primary malignant tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.