Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30985529›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)2019

Can Hyperparameter Tuning Improve the Performance of a Super Learner?: A Case Study.

Jenna Wong, Travis Manderson, Michal Abrahamowicz, David L Buckeridge, Robyn Tamblyn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jenna WongDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Travis MandersonSchool of Computer Science, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Michal AbrahamowiczDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
David L BuckeridgeDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Robyn TamblynDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuper learning is an ensemble machine learning approach used increasingly as an alternative to classical prediction techniques. When implementing super learning, however, not tuning the hyperparameters of the algorithms in it may adversely affect the performance of the super learner.

methodsIn this case study, we used data from a Canadian electronic prescribing system to predict when primary care physicians prescribed antidepressants for indications other than depression. The analysis included 73,576 antidepressant prescriptions and 373 candidate predictors. We derived two super learners: one using tuned hyperparameter values for each machine learning algorithm identified through an iterative grid search procedure and the other using the default values. We compared the performance of the tuned super learner to that of the super learner using default values ("untuned") and a carefully constructed logistic regression model from a previous analysis.

resultsThe tuned super learner had a scaled Brier score (R) of 0.322 (95% [confidence interval] CI = 0.267, 0.362). In comparison, the untuned super learner had a scaled Brier score of 0.309 (95% CI = 0.256, 0.353), corresponding to an efficiency loss of 4% (relative efficiency 0.96; 95% CI = 0.93, 0.99). The previously-derived logistic regression model had a scaled Brier score of 0.307 (95% CI = 0.245, 0.360), corresponding to an efficiency loss of 5% relative to the tuned super learner (relative efficiency 0.95; 95% CI = 0.88, 1.01).

conclusionsIn this case study, hyperparameter tuning produced a super learner that performed slightly better than an untuned super learner. Tuning the hyperparameters of individual algorithms in a super learner may help optimize performance.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAntidepressive AgentsMachine LearningCanadaData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansLogistic ModelsOff-Label UsePractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID30985529
PMCPMC6553550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.