Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30985497›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in oncology2019

The tumor microenvironment in renal cell cancer.

James W Mier

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The potential value of dual-energy CT radiomics in evaluating CD8Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

James W MierDivision of Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Harvard University · US

Funding

Treating the P13-Kinase/AKTP50CA101942 · NCI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Wanling Xie · 2003 to 2026
$53.4M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA101942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIn addition to the provision of nutrients and growth factors that facilitate tumor cell proliferation and metastasis, the tumor microenvironment (MEV) restricts immune surveillance of tumor-associated antigens and limits the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors, tumor vaccines, and other immune therapies. This review will focus on the immunosuppressive mechanisms operative within the tumor MVE of renal cell carcinoma. RECENT

findingsSeveral of the immunosuppressive mechanisms within the tumor MEV have been identified and are potentially druggable. Clinical trials with agents that target several of these inhibitory pathways are currently underway. SUMMARY: Although renal cell carcinoma is one of several tumor types responsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors, the effectiveness of these agents is likely to be limited by the various tumor-infiltrating bone marrow-derived myeloid cells that comprise the MEV. Several strategies to combat the recruitment of these cells into tumor tissue or to neutralize their immunosuppressive function have shown encouraging results in animal tumor models and clinical trials.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellCell ProliferationHumansImmunologic SurveillanceImmunotherapyKidney NeoplasmsNeoplastic Stem CellsTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID30985497
PMCPMC6467495
OpenAlexW2939671777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.