Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30985335›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational gastroenterology2019

Development and Validation of Confocal Endomicroscopy Diagnostic Criteria for Low-Grade Dysplasia in Barrett's Esophagus.

Massimiliano di Pietro, Helga Bertani, Maria OʼDonovan, Patricia Santos, Hani Alastal, Richard Phillips, Jacobo Ortiz-Fernández-Sordo, Marietta Iacucci, Ines Modolell, Luca Reggiani Bonetti and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Diagnosis of Clinical Complete Response by Probe-Based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (pCLE) After Chemoradiation for Advanced Rectal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Massimiliano di PietroMRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Helga BertaniDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Baggiovara, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Italy.
Maria OʼDonovanDepartment of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Patricia SantosMRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Hani AlastalMRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Richard PhillipsMRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Jacobo Ortiz-Fernández-SordoNIHR Nottingham Digestive Diseases Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Marietta IacucciInstitute of Translational of Medicine and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Ines ModolellDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Luca Reggiani BonettiDepartment of Pathology, Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Krish RagunathNIHR Nottingham Digestive Diseases Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Lorenz WernischMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
University of Cambridge · GBCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBMRC Cancer Unit · GBNIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBPoliclinico di Modena · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of South Wales · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12022/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesLow-grade dysplasia (LGD) in Barrett's esophagus (BE) is generally inconspicuous on conventional and magnified endoscopy. Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) provides insight into gastro-intestinal mucosa at cellular resolution. We aimed to identify endomicroscopic features and develop pCLE diagnostic criteria for BE-related LGD.

methodsThis was a retrospective study on pCLE videos generated in 2 prospective studies. In phase I, 2 investigators assessed 30 videos to identify LGD endomicroscopic features, which were then validated in an independent video set (n = 25). Criteria with average accuracy >80% and interobserver agreement κ > 0.4 were taken forward. In phase II, 6 endoscopists evaluated the criteria in an independent video set (n = 57). The area under receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed to find the best cutoff. Sensitivity, specificity, interobserver, and intraobserver agreements were calculated.

resultsIn phase I, 6 out of 8 criteria achieved the agreement and accuracy thresholds (i) dark nonround glands, (ii) irregular gland shape, (iii) lack of goblet cells, (iv) sharp cutoff of darkness, (v) variable cell size, and (vi) cellular stratification. The best cutoff for LGD diagnosis was 3 out of 6 positive criteria. In phase II, the diagnostic criteria had a sensitivity and specificity for LGD of 81.9% and 74.6%, respectively, with an area under receiver operating characteristic of 0.888. The interobserver agreement was substantial (κ = 0.654), and the mean intraobserver agreement was moderate (κ = 0.590).

conclusionsWe have generated and validated pCLE criteria for LGD in BE. Using these criteria, pCLE diagnosis of LGD is reproducible and has a substantial interobserver agreement.

Indexed as

Barrett EsophagusBiopsyEsophageal MucosaEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagoscopyHumansMicroscopy, ConfocalObserver VariationProspective StudiesReference StandardsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesROC CurveVideo Recording

Identifiers

PMID30985335
PMCPMC6602783
OpenAlexW2939618585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.