Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30985305›Full record

ArticleAnesthesiology2019

General Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: Occasionally Essential but Best Avoided.

Jill M Mhyre, Pervez Sultan

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05493891 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Testing the Association Between Low Back Pain Intensity and Core Muscle Strength in Women Who Underwent Cesarean or Vaginal Deliveries

TypeobservationalSponsorSouth Valley UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled36ConditionsLow Back Pain and Core MuscleArmsVisual analogue scale (VAS), Pressure Biofeedback Unit (PBU)
NCT05503758 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Quantification of Different Lumbar Paravertebral Muscles Properties in Women Who Experienced Cesarean Delivery Under Different Types of Anaesthesia

TypeobservationalSponsorSouth Valley UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled63ConditionsLumbar Paravertebral MusclesArmsMyoton PRO device (MyotonPRO, Myoton AS, Tallinn, Estonia)
NCT06160583 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

General Anesthesia in Obstetric Patients for Cesarean Section, Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorHospital Civil de GuadalajaraRan2023 to 2024Enrolled5,000ConditionsAnesthesia, Perinatal Morbidity, Maternal-Fetal Relations
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Obstructive sleep apnea in pregnant women.International anesthesiology clinics · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jill M MhyreFrom the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas (J.M.M.) the Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California (P.S.).
Pervez Sultan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralCesarean SectionFemaleHumansPregnancy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.