Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30985045›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2019

Three-dimensional reconstruction of defects in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a fetal MRI study.

F Prayer, M Metzelder, W Krois, P C Brugger, G M Gruber, M Weber, A Scharrer, A Rokitansky, G Langs, D Prayer and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Fetal MRI: what's new? A short review.European radiology experimental · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

F PrayerDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5607-8657
M MetzelderDepartment of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
W KroisDepartment of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
P C BruggerCenter for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Department of Anatomy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
G M GruberCenter for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Department of Anatomy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
M WeberDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
A ScharrerDepartment of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
A RokitanskyDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Social Medical Centre East, Danube Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
G LangsComputational Imaging Research Lab, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
D PrayerDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
E UngerCenter of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
G KasprianDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3858-3347
Medical University of Vienna · ATUniversität für Weiterbildung Krems · AT

Funding

Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG)M3dRES project
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the clinical feasibility and validity of fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction to locate, classify and quantify diaphragmatic defects in congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH).

methodsThis retrospective study included 46 cases of CDH which underwent a total of 69 fetal MRI scans (65 in-vivo and four postmortem) at the Medical University of Vienna during the period 1 January 2002 to 1 January 2017. Scans were performed between 16 and 38 gestational weeks using steady-state free precession, T2-weighted and T1-weighted sequences. MRI data were retrieved from the hospital database and manual segmentation of the diaphragm was performed with the open-source software, ITK-SNAP. The resulting 3D models of the fetal diaphragm and its defect(s) were validated by postmortem MRI segmentation and/or comparison of 3D model-based classification of the defect with a reference classification based on autopsy and/or surgery reports. Surface areas of the intact diaphragm and of the defect were measured and used to calculate defect-diaphragmatic ratios (DDR). The need for prosthetic patch repair and, in cases with repeated in-vivo fetal MRI scans, diaphragm growth dynamics, were analyzed based on DDR.

resultsFetal MRI-based manual segmentation of the diaphragm in CDH was feasible for all 65 (100%) of the in-vivo fetal MRI scans. Based on the 3D diaphragmatic models, one bilateral and 45 unilateral defects (n = 47) were further classified as posterolateral (23/47, 48.9%), lateral (7/47, 14.9%) or hemidiaphragmatic (17/47, 36.2%) defects, and none (0%) was classified as anterolateral. This classification of defect location was correct in all 37 (100%) of the cases in which this information could be verified. Nineteen cases had a follow-up fetal MRI scan; in five (26.3%) of these, the initial CDH classification was altered by the results of the second scan. Thirty-three fetuses underwent postnatal diaphragmatic surgical repair; 20 fetuses (all of those with DDR ≥ 54 and 88% of those with DDR > 30) received a diaphragmatic patch, while the other 13 underwent primary surgical repair. Individual DDRs at initial and at follow-up in-vivo fetal MRI correlated significantly (P < 0.001).

conclusionsMRI-based 3D reconstruction of the fetal diaphragm in CDH has been validated to visualize, locate, classify and quantify the defect. Planning of postnatal surgery may be optimized by MRI-based prediction of the necessity for patch placement and the ability to personalize patch design based on 3D-printable templates. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingPrenatal DiagnosisFemaleHernias, Diaphragmatic, CongenitalHumansPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyRetrospective StudiesCDHCDH classificationCDH typologycongenital diaphragmatic herniafetal diaphragmfetal MRIMRIMRI-based segmentation

Identifiers

PMID30985045
PMCPMC6619026
OpenAlexW2937206373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.