Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30985030›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of dermatology2019

Patient preference for biologic treatments of psoriasis in Japan.

Yayoi Tada, Kanako Ishii, Junko Kimura, Keigo Hanada, Isao Kawaguchi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of dermatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Interleukin-17A and Keratinocytes in Psoriasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  16. Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor in Atopic Dermatitis and Psoriasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yayoi TadaDepartment of Dermatology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3743-135X
Kanako IshiiAbbVie GK, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0183-9508
Junko KimuraAbbVie GK, Tokyo, Japan.
Keigo HanadaCRECON Medical Assessment Inc., Tokyo, Japan.
Isao KawaguchiAbbVie GK, Tokyo, Japan.
ABB (Japan) · JPTeikyo University · JP

Funding

AbbVie GK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psoriasis is a chronic autoimmune disease affecting skin which may also manifest in nails and joints. Several biologic treatments have been approved in Japan for psoriasis. Each biologic has a different profile for efficacy and safety, including different dosing regimens and co-payment considerations which may complicate treatment decisions made by patients and physicians during short consultations. Elucidating patient preference is expected to contribute to shared decision-making between patients and physicians to optimize treatment satisfaction and outcomes. However, the number of studies investigating this in Japan is very limited. The study used a discrete choice experiment methodology to elicit patient preferences for hypothetical options in an experimental framework. Participants were asked to choose their preferred treatment option from two hypothetical choices, defined by different levels of six attributes (i.e. early onset of efficacy, long-term efficacy, sustained efficacy after drug withdrawal, dosing convenience, co-payment and risk of serious infection). The survey included 16 treatment choice scenarios and was completed by 395 participants. Across all participants, the attribute regarded as most important was sustained efficacy after drug withdrawal, followed by dosing convenience, co-payment, long-term efficacy, early onset of efficacy and risk of serious infection. The study found that patients prefer treatments which have durable efficacy and lower treatment burden characterized as fewer injection frequency and lower co-payment. These results may be helpful to understand patient preference for biologic treatments used for psoriasis in Japan and contribute to shared decision-making between patients and physicians to improve patient satisfaction and treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiological ProductsDrug Administration ScheduleFees, PharmaceuticalFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedPatient PreferencePilot ProjectsPsoriasisSeverity of Illness IndexBiological Productsbiologicsdiscrete choice experimentJapanpatient preferencepsoriasis

Identifiers

PMID30985030
PMCPMC6594072
OpenAlexW2936261791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.