ArticleThe Journal of dermatology2019
Patient preference for biologic treatments of psoriasis in Japan.
Article in The Journal of dermatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab in Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Results from a 64-week phase 3 study (reSURFACE 1).The Journal of dermatology · 2021Trial
- Long-term efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab in Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Results from a 5-year extension of a phase 3 study (reSURFACE 1).The Journal of dermatology · 2021Trial
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Bimekizumab against Interleukin-23 Inhibitors in Patients with Plaque Psoriasis in Japan.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Patient-centred Preferences for Biologic Therapies in Moderate to Severe Psoriasis in Vietnam: A Discrete Choice Experiment.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2025Article
- Treatment patterns of systemic drug use in Japanese patients with plaque psoriasis: A retrospective chart review.The Journal of dermatology · 2024Article
- Bimekizumab Efficacy and Safety in Japanese Patients with Plaque Psoriasis in BE VIVID: A Phase 3, Ustekinumab and Placebo-Controlled Study.Dermatology and therapy · 2023Article
- Preferences for Rehabilitation in Persons with a History of Stroke: A Discrete Choice Experiment.Patient preference and adherence · 2023Article
- Treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with systemic therapy in Japan: A retrospective claims database study.The Journal of dermatology · 2022Observational
- Work productivity in real-life employed patients with plaque psoriasis: Results from the ProLOGUE study.The Journal of dermatology · 2022Article
- Dynamics of Patient-Based Benefit-Risk Assessment of Medicines in Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review.Patient preference and adherence · 2022Review
- Patient Preference for Biologic Treatments of Psoriasis in the Chinese Setting.Patient preference and adherence · 2022Article
- Article
- Interleukin-17A and Keratinocytes in Psoriasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor in Atopic Dermatitis and Psoriasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Psoriasis is a chronic autoimmune disease affecting skin which may also manifest in nails and joints. Several biologic treatments have been approved in Japan for psoriasis. Each biologic has a different profile for efficacy and safety, including different dosing regimens and co-payment considerations which may complicate treatment decisions made by patients and physicians during short consultations. Elucidating patient preference is expected to contribute to shared decision-making between patients and physicians to optimize treatment satisfaction and outcomes. However, the number of studies investigating this in Japan is very limited. The study used a discrete choice experiment methodology to elicit patient preferences for hypothetical options in an experimental framework. Participants were asked to choose their preferred treatment option from two hypothetical choices, defined by different levels of six attributes (i.e. early onset of efficacy, long-term efficacy, sustained efficacy after drug withdrawal, dosing convenience, co-payment and risk of serious infection). The survey included 16 treatment choice scenarios and was completed by 395 participants. Across all participants, the attribute regarded as most important was sustained efficacy after drug withdrawal, followed by dosing convenience, co-payment, long-term efficacy, early onset of efficacy and risk of serious infection. The study found that patients prefer treatments which have durable efficacy and lower treatment burden characterized as fewer injection frequency and lower co-payment. These results may be helpful to understand patient preference for biologic treatments used for psoriasis in Japan and contribute to shared decision-making between patients and physicians to improve patient satisfaction and treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.