ArticleProteins2019
Protein tertiary structure modeling driven by deep learning and contact distance prediction in CASP13.
Article in Proteins, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
76 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive evaluation of artificial intelligence-empowered approaches for protein-aptamer complex prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Computational approaches for RNA structure prediction and design.Cell reports. Physical science · 2026Article
- The transformative impact of AI-enabled AlphaFold 3: evolution, current status, and future prospects in structural biology.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Application of artificial intelligence in life science: Historical review and future perspectives.Fundamental research · 2026Review
- A Comprehensive Review on Homology Modelling in Drug Development: Methodologies, Tools, and Evaluation.Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Characterizing Protein Corona, Nanobiological Interactions, and Advancing Drug Discovery.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Transmembrane Prostate Androgen-Induced Protein 1 Molecular Modeling and Refinement Using Coarse-Grained Molecular Dynamics.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Protein structure prediction via deep learning: an in-depth review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Deep learning methods for protein function prediction.Proteomics · 2025Review
- The State-of-the-Art Overview to Application of Deep Learning in Accurate Protein Design and Structure Prediction.Topics in current chemistry (Cham) · 2024Review
- Quantum chemical "Aufbau" principles: how to estimate the shape of highly flexible (bio-)polymers? A recursively extendable "chemion picture" of Euler-Hückel-type.Journal of molecular modeling · 2024Article
- An interactive visualization tool for educational outreach in protein contact map overlap analysis.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Recent Advances in Protein Folding Pathway Prediction through Computational Methods.Current medicinal chemistry · 2024Review
- Article
- Deep Learning for Genomics: From Early Neural Nets to Modern Large Language Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- When will RNA get its AlphaFold moment?Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Improving AlphaFold2-based protein tertiary structure prediction with MULTICOM in CASP15.Communications chemistry · 2023Article
- Combining pairwise structural similarity and deep learning interface contact prediction to estimate protein complex model accuracy in CASP15.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- In silico design of a polypeptide as a vaccine candidate against ascariasis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- First Impressions Matter: Immune Imprinting and Antibody Cross-Reactivity in Influenza and SARS-CoV-2.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predicting residue-residue distance relationships (eg, contacts) has become the key direction to advance protein structure prediction since 2014 CASP11 experiment, while deep learning has revolutionized the technology for contact and distance distribution prediction since its debut in 2012 CASP10 experiment. During 2018 CASP13 experiment, we enhanced our MULTICOM protein structure prediction system with three major components: contact distance prediction based on deep convolutional neural networks, distance-driven template-free (ab initio) modeling, and protein model ranking empowered by deep learning and contact prediction. Our experiment demonstrates that contact distance prediction and deep learning methods are the key reasons that MULTICOM was ranked 3rd out of all 98 predictors in both template-free and template-based structure modeling in CASP13. Deep convolutional neural network can utilize global information in pairwise residue-residue features such as coevolution scores to substantially improve contact distance prediction, which played a decisive role in correctly folding some free modeling and hard template-based modeling targets. Deep learning also successfully integrated one-dimensional structural features, two-dimensional contact information, and three-dimensional structural quality scores to improve protein model quality assessment, where the contact prediction was demonstrated to consistently enhance ranking of protein models for the first time. The success of MULTICOM system clearly shows that protein contact distance prediction and model selection driven by deep learning holds the key of solving protein structure prediction problem. However, there are still challenges in accurately predicting protein contact distance when there are few homologous sequences, folding proteins from noisy contact distances, and ranking models of hard targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.