Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30984901›Full record

ArticlePhysical review. E2018

Information estimation using nonparametric copulas.

Houman Safaai, Arno Onken, Christopher D Harvey, Stefano Panzeri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical review. E, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Computational methods to study information processing in neural circuits.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Houman SafaaiDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Arno OnkenSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Christopher D HarveyDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Stefano PanzeriIstituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Rovereto, Italy.

Funding

Readout and control of spatiotemporal neuronal codes for behaviorU19NS107464 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SHOHAM, SHY · 2018 to 2022
$17.3M
Studying perceptual decision-making across cortex by combining population imaging, connectomics, and computational modelingR01NS108410 · NINDS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI HARVEY, CHRISTOPHER D, LEE, WEI-CHUNG ALLEN · 2018 to 2022
$5.7M
Parietal Cortex Networks for Sensorimotor Processing During NavigationR01NS089521 · NINDS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI HARVEY, CHRISTOPHER D · 2015 to 2024
$4.5M
New approaches to understand neuronal microcircuit dynamics for working memoryR01MH107620 · NIMH · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI HARVEY, CHRISTOPHER D · 2015 to 2019
$2.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107620NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS089521NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS108410NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS107464Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estimation of mutual information between random variables has become crucial in a range of fields, from physics to neuroscience to finance. Estimating information accurately over a wide range of conditions relies on the development of flexible methods to describe statistical dependencies among variables, without imposing potentially invalid assumptions on the data. Such methods are needed in cases that lack prior knowledge of their statistical properties and that have limited sample numbers. Here we propose a powerful and generally applicable information estimator based on non-parametric copulas. This estimator, called the non-parametric copula-based estimator (NPC), is tailored to take into account detailed stochastic relationships in the data independently of the data's marginal distributions. The NPC estimator can be used both for continuous and discrete numerical variables and thus provides a single framework for the mutual information estimation of both continuous and discrete data. By extensive validation on artificial samples drawn from various statistical distributions, we found that the NPC estimator compares well against commonly used alternatives. Unlike methods not based on copulas, it allows an estimation of information that is robust to changes of the details of the marginal distributions. Unlike parametric copula methods, it remains accurate regardless of the precise form of the interactions between the variables. In addition, the NPC estimator had accurate information estimates even at low sample numbers, in comparison to alternative estimators. The NPC estimator therefore provides a good balance between general applicability to arbitrarily shaped statistical dependencies in the data and shows accurate and robust performance when working with small sample sizes. We anticipate that the non-parametric copula information estimator will be a powerful tool in estimating mutual information between a broad range of data.

Identifiers

PMID30984901
PMCPMC6458593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.