ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2019
Using Bioactive Glasses in the Management of Burns.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- Shedding Light on the Cellular Uptake Mechanisms of Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles as Controlled Intracellular Delivery Platforms: A Review of the Recent Literature.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Bioactive Glasses: Advancing Skin Tissue Repair through Multifunctional Mechanisms and Innovations.Biomaterials research · 2025Review
- Review
- Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles in the SiOJournal of functional biomaterials · 2022Article
- Stem cell-mediated angiogenesis in skin tissue engineering and wound healing.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2022Review
- Bioactive Properties of Composites Based on Silicate Glasses and Different Silver and Gold Structures.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Osteogenic Potential of Magnesium (Mg)-Doped Multicomponent Bioactive Glass: In Vitro and In Vivo Animal Studies.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Modulating degradation of sodium alginate/bioglass hydrogel for improving tissue infiltration and promoting wound healing.Bioactive materials · 2021Article
- Article
- Dissolution of Amorphous S53P4 Glass Scaffolds in Dynamic In Vitro Conditions.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles and Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses for Wound Management: From Skin Regeneration to Cancer Therapy.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Silica-Based Bioactive Glasses and Their Applications in Hard Tissue Regeneration: A Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles (Nanoceria): Hopes in Soft Tissue Engineering.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Uniting Drug and Delivery: Metal Oxide Hybrid Nanotherapeutics for Skin Wound Care.Pharmaceutics · 2020Review
- Enhanced biological properties of collagen/chitosan-coated poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffold by surface modification with GHK-Cu peptide and 58S bioglass.Progress in biomaterials · 2020Article
- Bioactive borate glass triggers phenotypic changes in adipose stem cells.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2020Article
- Surface Engineered Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) Based Novel Hybrid Systems for Effective Wound Healing: A Review of Recent Developments.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Functionalization and Surface Modifications of Bioactive Glasses (BGs): Tailoring of the Biological Response Working on the Outermost Surface Layer.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Management and prevention of drug resistant infections in burn patients.Expert review of anti-infective therapy · 2019Review
- Multiple and Promising Applications of Strontium (Sr)-Containing Bioactive Glasses in Bone Tissue Engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The management of burn injuries is considered an unmet clinical need and, to date, no fully satisfactory solution exists to this problem. This mini-review aims to explore the potential of bioactive glasses (BGs) for burn care due to the therapeutic effects of their ionic dissolution products. BGs have been studied for more than 40 years and boast a long successful history in the substitution of damaged tissues, especially bone. Considering their exceptional versatility and attractive characteristics, these synthetic materials have also recently been proposed in the treatment of soft tissue-related disorders such as skin wounds. Specifically, improving fibroblast proliferation, inducing angiogenesis, and eliciting antibacterial activity (with the additional advantage of avoiding administration of antibiotics) are all considered as key added values carried by BGs in the treatment of burn injuries. However, some issues deserve careful consideration while proceeding with the research, including the selection of suitable BG compositions, appropriate forms of application (e.g., BG fibers, ointments or composite patches), as well as the procedures for reliable
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.