Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30984503›Full record

ReviewGlobal spine journal2019

Intrawound Treatment for Prevention of Surgical Site Infections in Instrumented Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Comparative Effectiveness Review and Meta-Analysis.

Justin V C Lemans, Sebastiaan P J Wijdicks, Willemijn Boot, Geertje A M Govaert, R Marijn Houwert, F Cumhur Öner, Moyo C Kruyt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global spine journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Postoperative wound complications and revisions in high-risk patients undergoing spine surgery with prophylactic muscle flap reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Role of local streptomycin in prevention of surgical site infection in TB spine.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Justin V C LemansDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Sebastiaan P J WijdicksDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Willemijn BootDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Geertje A M GovaertUtrecht Traumacenter, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
R Marijn HouwertUtrecht Traumacenter, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
F Cumhur ÖnerDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Moyo C KruytDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designSystematic review and meta-analysis.

objectivesTo determine the efficacy of intrawound treatments in reducing deep surgical site infections (SSIs) in instrumented spinal surgery.

methodsThe electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane were systematically searched for intrawound treatments for the prevention of SSIs in clean instrumented spine surgery. Both randomized controlled trials and comparative cohort studies were included. The results of included studies were pooled for meta-analysis.

resultsAfter full text- and reference screening, 20 articles were included. There were 2 randomized controlled trials and 18 observational studies. Sixteen studies investigated the use of intrawound antibiotics, and 4 studies investigated the use of intrawound antiseptics. The relative risk of deep SSI for any treatment was 0.26 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16-0.44,

conclusionsBoth the use of antibiotic and antiseptic intrawound prophylactics was associated with a significant 3 to 7 times reduction of deep SSIs in instrumented spine surgery. No adverse events were reported in the included studies.

Indexed as

intrawoundpostoperative infectionpovidone-iodinepreventionprophylaxissurgical site infectionvancomycin

Identifiers

PMID30984503
PMCPMC6448203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.