Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30984372›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2019

Advancing understanding, diagnosis, and therapies for cutaneous lupus erythematosus within the broader context of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Kristen L Chen, Rebecca L Krain, Victoria P Werth

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristen L ChenDepartment of Dermatology, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VAMC, 3900 Woodland Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0361-9234
Rebecca L KrainDepartment of Dermatology, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VAMC, 3900 Woodland Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Victoria P WerthDepartment of Dermatology, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VAMC, 3900 Woodland Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Philadelphia VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Optimization of Clinical Trial Design in Cutaneous LupusR01AR071653 · NIAMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHONG, BENJAMIN FRANKLIN, WERTH, VICTORIA P · 2018 to 2020
$653k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR071653
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is an autoimmune disease that can be associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) symptoms. The pathogenesis of both CLE and SLE is multifactorial, involving genetic susceptibility, environmental factors, and innate and adaptive immune responses. Despite the efficacy of current medications, many patients remain refractory, highlighting the necessity for new treatment options. Unfortunately, owing to challenges related in part to trial design and disease heterogeneity, only one new biologic in the last 50 years has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of SLE. Thus, although SLE and CLE have a similar pathogenesis, patients with CLE who do not meet criteria for SLE cannot benefit from this advancement. This article discusses the recent trials and emphasizes the need to include patients with single-organ lupus, such as CLE, in SLE trials.

Indexed as

Lupus Erythematosus, SystemicGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansLupus Erythematosus, CutaneousUnited Statesclinical trialscutaneous lupus erythematosussystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID30984372
PMCPMC6436187
OpenAlexW2925307748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.