Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30984347›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2019

Prognostic significance of perioperative tumor marker levels in stage II/III gastric cancer.

Yasuhito Suenaga, Mitsuro Kanda, Seiji Ito, Yoshinari Mochizuki, Hitoshi Teramoto, Kiyoshi Ishigure, Toshifumi Murai, Takahiro Asada, Akiharu Ishiyama, Hidenobu Matsushita and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 - tumor marker: Past, present, and future.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Yasuhito SuenagaDepartment of Surgery, Yokkaichi Municipal Hospital, Yokkaichi 510-8567, Japan.
Mitsuro KandaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan. m-kanda@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp.
Seiji ItoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya 464-8681, Japan.
Yoshinari MochizukiDepartment of Surgery, Komaki Municipal Hospital, Komaki 485-8520, Japan.
Hitoshi TeramotoDepartment of Surgery, Yokkaichi Municipal Hospital, Yokkaichi 510-8567, Japan.
Kiyoshi IshigureDepartment of Surgery, Konan Kosei Hospital, Konan 483-8704, Japan.
Toshifumi MuraiDepartment of Surgery, Ichinomiya Municipal Hospital, Ichinomiya 491-8558, Japan.
Takahiro AsadaDepartment of Surgery, Gifu Prefectural Tajimi Hospital, Tajimi 507-8522, Japan.
Akiharu IshiyamaDepartment of Surgery, Okazaki City Hospital, Okazaki 444-8553, Japan.
Hidenobu MatsushitaDepartment of Surgery, Tosei General Hospital, Seto 489-8642, Japan.
Chie TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan.
Daisuke KobayashiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan.
Michitaka FujiwaraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan.
Kenta MurotaniBiostatistics Center, Graduate School of Medicine, Kurume University, Kurume 830-0011, Japan.
Yasuhiro KoderaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan.
Nagoya University · JPYokkaichi Municipal Hospital · JPAichi Cancer Center · JPGifu Prefectural Tajimi Hospital · JPIchinomiya Municipal City Hospital · JPKomaki City Hospital · JPKurume University · JPTosei General Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the prognostic significance of perioperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels in stage II/III gastric cancer.

methodsFrom a multi-institutional retrospective database compiled by integrating clinical data from nine institutions, data of 998 patients who underwent curative resection for stage II/III gastric cancer between 2010 and 2014 were retrieved and analyzed. The prognostic impact of the preoperative and postoperative levels and chronological changes in CEA, CA19-9 and their combination were evaluated. To test whether postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy alters the prognostic impact of perioperative CEA and CA19-9 levels, the hazard ratios for mortality were compared between patients who underwent surgery alone and patients who underwent surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy.

resultsThe prognostic impact of postoperative CEA and CA19-9 was superior to that of the preoperative levels. Multivariable analysis identified high postoperative CEA and CA19-9 levels as independent prognostic factors for overall survival. Disease-free survival rates clearly decreased in a stepwise manner in association with postoperative CEA and CA19-9 levels, and patients with high levels of both markers showed significantly poorer prognosis than other patient groups. When we analyzed perioperative changes in serum CEA and CA19-9 levels, patients with high levels before and after surgery had the worst disease-free survival rates among all patient groups. Patients with normalized CEA levels after surgery had a significantly lower disease-free survival rate than those with normal perioperative levels, whereas patients with normalized CA19-9 levels after surgery had equivalent survival to those with normal perioperative levels. The prognostic impact of high CEA levels was observably smaller in patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy than in patients who underwent surgery alone, whereas that of high CA19-9 was greater in patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. High postoperative CEA levels were significantly associated with an increased prevalence of liver, lung and bone recurrences, and high postoperative CA19-9 levels were significantly associated with increased frequencies of lymph node and liver recurrences.

conclusionThe evaluation of serum CEA and CA 19-9 levels both before and after surgery provides useful information for precise risk stratification after curative gastrectomy.

Indexed as

Carbohydrate antigen 19-9Carcinoembryonic antigenGastric cancerPerioperative levelsPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID30984347
PMCPMC6451928
OpenAlexW2909425161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.