ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2019
Prognostic significance of perioperative tumor marker levels in stage II/III gastric cancer.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preoperative hypoalbuminemia as a prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer undergoing radical gastrectomy: Construction of a nomogram.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- Tumor index predicts recurrences of patients with pathological stage Ⅰ gastric cancer after radical surgical resection.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of XELOX combined with neoadjuvant radiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Prognostic effect of CEA, AFP, CA19‑9 and CA242 for recurrence/metastasis of gastric cancer following radical gastrectomy.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Prognostic value and predictive model of tumor markers in stage I to III gastric cancer patients.World journal of clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- Prognostic significance of post-preoperative tumor markers increments in patients with non-metastatic gastric cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Delta computed tomography radiomics features-based nomogram predicts long-term efficacy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer.La Radiologia medica · 2023Article
- Comparison of CEA and CA19-9 as a predictive factor for recurrence after curative gastrectomy in gastric cancer.BMC surgery · 2022Review
- Putative Clinical Potential ofCancers · 2022Article
- Construction and Validation of Convenient Clinicopathologic Signatures for Predicting the Prognosis of Stage I-III Gastric Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- 'FLARE' of tumor marker in advanced gastric cancer treated with first-line systemic therapy.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2022Article
- The Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score Predicts Survival in Gastric Cancer Patients with Normal CEA and CA19-9.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022Article
- Prognostic impact of CEA/CA19-9 at the time of recurrence in patients with gastric cancer.Surgery today · 2021Article
- Prognostic significance of CEA, Ki67 and p53 in pseudomyxoma peritonei of appendiceal origin.The Journal of international medical research · 2021Article
- CA724 predicts overall survival in locally advanced gastric cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 - tumor marker: Past, present, and future.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo evaluate the prognostic significance of perioperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels in stage II/III gastric cancer.
methodsFrom a multi-institutional retrospective database compiled by integrating clinical data from nine institutions, data of 998 patients who underwent curative resection for stage II/III gastric cancer between 2010 and 2014 were retrieved and analyzed. The prognostic impact of the preoperative and postoperative levels and chronological changes in CEA, CA19-9 and their combination were evaluated. To test whether postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy alters the prognostic impact of perioperative CEA and CA19-9 levels, the hazard ratios for mortality were compared between patients who underwent surgery alone and patients who underwent surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy.
resultsThe prognostic impact of postoperative CEA and CA19-9 was superior to that of the preoperative levels. Multivariable analysis identified high postoperative CEA and CA19-9 levels as independent prognostic factors for overall survival. Disease-free survival rates clearly decreased in a stepwise manner in association with postoperative CEA and CA19-9 levels, and patients with high levels of both markers showed significantly poorer prognosis than other patient groups. When we analyzed perioperative changes in serum CEA and CA19-9 levels, patients with high levels before and after surgery had the worst disease-free survival rates among all patient groups. Patients with normalized CEA levels after surgery had a significantly lower disease-free survival rate than those with normal perioperative levels, whereas patients with normalized CA19-9 levels after surgery had equivalent survival to those with normal perioperative levels. The prognostic impact of high CEA levels was observably smaller in patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy than in patients who underwent surgery alone, whereas that of high CA19-9 was greater in patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. High postoperative CEA levels were significantly associated with an increased prevalence of liver, lung and bone recurrences, and high postoperative CA19-9 levels were significantly associated with increased frequencies of lymph node and liver recurrences.
conclusionThe evaluation of serum CEA and CA 19-9 levels both before and after surgery provides useful information for precise risk stratification after curative gastrectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.