Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30984316›Full record

ArticleThe EPMA journal2019

Vaginal dryness: individualised patient profiles, risks and mitigating measures.

Vadym Goncharenko, Rostyslav Bubnov, Jiri Polivka, Pavol Zubor, Kamil Biringer, Tibor Bielik, Walther Kuhn, Olga Golubnitschaja

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EPMA journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Up for the tackle? The pelvic floor and rugby. A review.European journal of sport science · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Vadym GoncharenkoGynaecologic Department, Clinical Hospital "Pheophania", Kyiv, Ukraine.
Rostyslav BubnovUltrasound Department, Clinical Hospital "Pheophania", Kyiv, Ukraine.
Jiri Polivka4Department of Histology and Embryology and Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Pavol Zubor6Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Martin University Hospital, Martin, Slovak Republic.
Kamil Biringer6Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Martin University Hospital, Martin, Slovak Republic.
Tibor Bielik6Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Martin University Hospital, Martin, Slovak Republic.
Walther KuhnCentre of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, DonauIsar Klinikum Deggendorf-Dingolfing, Landau, Germany.
Olga Golubnitschaja9Radiological clinic, UKB, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105 Bonn, Germany.
Martin University Hospital · SKCharles University · CZDanylo Zabolotny Institute of Microbiology and Virology · UAUniversity of Bonn · DEUniversity of Koblenz and Landau · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaginal dryness (VD) affects both pre- and postmenopausal women at any age. Since the hormonal regulation changes during the climacteric period are considered as being the main course of the VD, affected women prefer not to talk about the problem. However, the problem does exist, and unfortunately if any, relatively minor group in the population possesses the health literacy at sufficient level to understand that VD is a suboptimal health condition which carries a multi-factorial character. Thereby, some of the contributing factors are clearly preventable and, therefore, if treated properly, have a potential to milden the VD. Current chapter demonstrates specific signs and symptoms of Flammer syndrome in women suffering from vaginal dryness, although individualised patient profiles clearly discriminate between pre- and postmenopausal women regarding the subgroup-specific symptoms. Noteworthy, about 20% of the VD patients involved in the study notify a delayed or even impaired wound healing observed for themselves over a couple of years. Optimising modifiable risk factors accompanying FS phenotype at the level of primary prevention is strongly recommended. Individualised patient profiles provide important information for VD mitigating measures tailored to the person. Further, future projects should essentially deal with the complexity of vulvar-vaginal dryness as part of the Sicca syndrome in individuals with FS phenotype, in order to prevent genital female cancers which may occur at any age. In contrast to the human papilloma virus as possible trigger of the disease, the role of the vulvar-vaginal dryness as an important risk factor is strongly underestimated in currently applied diagnostic and treatment approaches.

Indexed as

Altered sense regulationBlood pressureDehydrationDyspareuniaFlammer syndromeHeadacheHormonal regulationLife qualityMenopauseMicrobiomePainPsychological aspectsSexual intercourseSiccaStressVaginal drynessVaginal dysfunctionVasoconstrictionVulva cancer

Identifiers

PMID30984316
PMCPMC6459457
OpenAlexW2918672521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.