ArticleFrontiers in genetics2019
Simultaneous Interrogation of Cancer Omics to Identify Subtypes With Significant Clinical Differences.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable data generation from observed small samples by matrix tri-factorization.Nature communications · 2026Article
- DriverSub-SVM: a machine learning approach for cancer subtype classification by integrating patient-specific and global driver genes.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Uncovering the Understanding of the Concept of Patient Similarity in Cancer Research and Treatment: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Advanced computational predictive models of miRNA-mRNA interaction efficiency.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- wMKL: multi-omics data integration enables novel cancer subtype identification via weight-boosted multi-kernel learning.British journal of cancer · 2024Article
- Patient subgrouping with distinct survival rates via integration of multiomics data on a Grassmann manifold.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Molecular Subtyping of Cancer Based on Robust Graph Neural Network and Multi-Omics Data Integration.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- MoGCN: A Multi-Omics Integration Method Based on Graph Convolutional Network for Cancer Subtype Analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- MultiGATAE: A Novel Cancer Subtype Identification Method Based on Multi-Omics and Attention Mechanism.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Evaluation and comparison of multi-omics data integration methods for cancer subtyping.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- IOAT: an interactive tool for statistical analysis of omics data and clinical data.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Review
- Dissecting Cellular Heterogeneity Based on Network Denoising of scRNA-seq Using Local Scaling Self-Diffusion.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Article
- Is There Any Sequence Feature in the RNA Pseudouridine Modification Prediction Problem?Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2020Article
- Article
- Integrative Network Fusion: A Multi-Omics Approach in Molecular Profiling.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Article
- Identification of Pan-Cancer Prognostic Biomarkers Through Integration of Multi-Omics Data.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Non-Negative Symmetric Low-Rank Representation Graph Regularized Method for Cancer Clustering Based on Score Function.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Sparse Graph Regularization Non-Negative Matrix Factorization Based on Huber Loss Model for Cancer Data Analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in high-throughput sequencing have accelerated the accumulation of omics data on the same tumor tissue from multiple sources. Intensive study of multi-omics integration on tumor samples can stimulate progress in precision medicine and is promising in detecting potential biomarkers. However, current methods are restricted owing to highly unbalanced dimensions of omics data or difficulty in assigning weights between different data sources. Therefore, the appropriate approximation and constraints of integrated targets remain a major challenge. In this paper, we proposed an omics data integration method, named high-order path elucidated similarity (HOPES). HOPES fuses the similarities derived from various omics data sources to solve the dimensional discrepancy, and progressively elucidate the similarities from each type of omics data into an integrated similarity with various high-order connected paths. Through a series of incremental constraints for commonality, HOPES can take both specificity of single data and consistency between different data types into consideration. The fused similarity matrix gives global insight into patients' correlation and efficiently distinguishes subgroups. We tested the performance of HOPES on both a simulated dataset and several empirical tumor datasets. The test datasets contain three omics types including gene expression, DNA methylation, and microRNA data for five different TCGA cancer projects. Our method was shown to achieve superior accuracy and high robustness compared with several benchmark methods on simulated data. Further experiments on five cancer datasets demonstrated that HOPES achieved superior performances in cancer classification. The stratified subgroups were shown to have statistically significant differences in survival. We further located and identified the key genes, methylation sites, and microRNAs within each subgroup. They were shown to achieve high potential prognostic value and were enriched in many cancer-related biological processes or pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.