Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30984190›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in immunology2019

Double Positive CD4

Perrine Bohner, Mathieu F Chevalier, Valérie Cesson, Sonia-Christina Rodrigues-Dias, Florence Dartiguenave, Rodolfo Burruni, Thomas Tawadros, Massimo Valerio, Ilaria Lucca, Denise Nardelli-Haefliger and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. CD8Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. The double-positive cells in the tumor microenvironment.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2026
    Article
  7. Functionally heterogeneous intratumoral CD4Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Perrine BohnerUrology Research Unit, Urology Department, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mathieu F ChevalierUrology Research Unit, Urology Department, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Valérie CessonUrology Research Unit, Urology Department, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Sonia-Christina Rodrigues-DiasUrology Research Unit, Urology Department, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Florence DartiguenaveUrology Research Unit, Urology Department, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Rodolfo BurruniUrology Research Unit, Urology Department, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Thomas TawadrosUrology Research Unit, Urology Department, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Massimo ValerioUrology Research Unit, Urology Department, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ilaria LuccaUrology Research Unit, Urology Department, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Denise Nardelli-HaefligerUrology Research Unit, Urology Department, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Patrice JichlinskiUrology Research Unit, Urology Department, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Laurent DerréUrology Research Unit, Urology Department, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The immune system plays a central role in cancer development, showing both anti-tumor and pro-tumor activities depending on the immune cell subsets and the disease context. While CD8 T cells are associated with a favorable outcome in most cancers, only T helper type 1 (Th1) CD4 T cells play a protective role, in contrast to Th2 CD4 T cells. Double positive (DP) CD4

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCD4 AntigensCD8 AntigensFemaleFlow CytometryHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedProstatic NeoplasmsTh2 CellsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsCD4 AntigensCD8 Antigensbladder cancerCD4+CD8+ T cellsdouble positive T cellskidney cancerprostate cancerTh1Th2

Identifiers

PMID30984190
PMCPMC6450069
OpenAlexW2929012249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.