Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30984039›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2019

Emotional Biases and Recurrence in Major Depressive Disorder. Results of 2.5 Years Follow-Up of Drug-Free Cohort Vulnerable for Recurrence.

Henricus G Ruhe, Roel J T Mocking, Caroline A Figueroa, Paulien W J Seeverens, Nessa Ikani, Anna Tyborowska, Michael Browning, Janna N Vrijsen, Catherine J Harmer, Aart H Schene

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Emotion-Processing Biases and Neural Connectivity in Remitted Major Depressive Disorder among Adolescents.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Remission is insufficient: predictors and mechanistic models of recurrence in late-life depression.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Henricus G RuheDepartment of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Roel J T MockingDepartment of Psychiatry, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Caroline A FigueroaDepartment of Psychiatry, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Paulien W J SeeverensDepartment of Psychiatry, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Nessa IkaniDepartment of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Anna TyborowskaDepartment of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Michael BrowningDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Janna N VrijsenDepartment of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Catherine J HarmerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Aart H ScheneDepartment of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N008103/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An interesting factor explaining recurrence risk in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) may be neuropsychological functioning, i.e., processing of emotional stimuli/information. Negatively biased processing of emotional stimuli/information has been found in both acute and (inconclusively) remitted states of MDD, and may be causally related to recurrence of depression. We aimed to investigate self-referent, memory and interpretation biases in recurrently depressed patients in remission and relate these biases to recurrence. We included 69 remitted recurrent MDD-patients (rrMDD-patients), 35-65 years, with ≥2 episodes, voluntarily free of antidepressant maintenance therapy for at least 4 weeks. We tested self-referent biases with an emotional categorization task, bias in emotional memory by free recall of the emotion categorization task 15 min after completing it, and interpretation bias with a facial expression recognition task. We compared these participants with 43 never-depressed controls matched for age, sex and intelligence. We followed the rrMDD-patients for 2.5 years and assessed recurrent depressive episodes by structured interview. The rrMDD-patients showed biases toward emotionally negative stimuli, faster responses to negative self-relevant characteristics in the emotional categorization, better recognition of sad faces, worse recognition of neutral faces with more misclassifications as angry or disgusting faces and less misclassifications as neutral faces (0.001 <

Indexed as

emotional biasmajor depressive disorderpredictionrecurrencerelapseremission

Identifiers

PMID30984039
PMCPMC6447719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.