Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30984037›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2019

Psychometric Evaluation of the Nine-Item Problematic Internet Use Questionnaire (PIUQ-9) in Nine European Samples of Internet Users.

Stéphanie Laconi, Róbert Urbán, Katarzyna Kaliszewska-Czeremska, Daria J Kuss, Augusto Gnisci, Ida Sergi, Antonia Barke, Franziska Jeromin, Jarosław Groth, Manuel Gamez-Guadix and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Stéphanie LaconiLaboratoire CERPPS (Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Psychopathologie et Psychologie de la Santé) - EA 7411 - Université Toulouse 2 Jean Jaurès, Toulouse, France.
Róbert UrbánInstitute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Katarzyna Kaliszewska-CzeremskaInstitute of Psychology, Jesuit University Ignatianum, Krakow, Poland.
Daria J KussInternational Gaming Research Unit, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Augusto GnisciDepartment of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Caserta, Italy.
Ida SergiDepartment of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Caserta, Italy.
Antonia BarkeClinical and Biological Psychology, Catholic University Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Eichstätt, Germany.
Franziska JerominDepartment of Psychology, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Jarosław GrothInstitute of Psychology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland.
Manuel Gamez-GuadixFaculty of Psychology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Neslihan Keser OzcanDepartment of Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Konstantinos SiomosHellenic Association for the Study of Internet Addiction Disorder, Athens, Greece.
Georgios D FlorosDepartment of Psychiatry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Mark D GriffithsInternational Gaming Research Unit, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Zsolt DemetrovicsInstitute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Orsolya KirályInstitute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

cross-cultural studiesinternet addictiononline addictionproblematic internet useProblematic Internet Use Questionnairepsychometric propertiesscreening instrument

Identifiers

PMID30984037
PMCPMC6448041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.