ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2019
Factors Influencing Delays in Patient Access to New Medicines in Canada: A Retrospective Study of Reimbursement Processes in Public Drug Plans.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reimbursement decision-making system in Poland systematically compared to other countries.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Pooled it
- HTA submission strategies and their associations with rollout times and type of HTA recommendation in Australia and Canada.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2026Observational
- Global disparities in access to diagnostics and therapies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: from discovery to delivery - a review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Do conditional marketing authorisations actually accelerate patient access? Time-to-access of conditional vs. standard marketing authorisations in Italy, Spain, and Germany.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2026Article
- Accelerating Oncology Drug Reimbursement in Canada: Impact of the CDA-AMC Time-Limited Recommendation and pCPA Temporary Access Process.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Health technology assessment of medicinal products in Greece: a 5-year (2018-2023) review of timelines and productivity.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2024Article
- How can health technology assessment be improved to optimise access to medicines? Results from a Delphi study in Europe : Better access to medicines through HTA.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024Article
- Access to Oncology Medicines in Canada: Consensus Forum for Recommendations for Improvement.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Article
- Impact of Systemic Delays for Patient Access to Oncology Drugs on Clinical, Economic, and Quality of Life Outcomes in Canada: A Call to Action.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Review
- An Optional Delinked Reward System: Making Pharmaceutical Innovation Work for Everyone.Applied health economics and health policy · 2024Article
- Timeliness of Health Technology Assessments and Price Negotiations for Oncology Drugs in Canada.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2024Article
- Impact of Oncology Drug Review Times on Public Funding Recommendations.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- Trends in the utilization of medicines sold in the private sector post- registration in South Africa and the implications for similar countries.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Association of exogenous factors with the access to innovative pharmaceutical products in Hungary.PloS one · 2023Article
- Focused Jurisdictional Scan of Glomerulonephritis Medication Access in Canada: A Program Report.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2023Article
- The reimbursement decision speed for oncology new drugs in China and its determinant factors.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Estimating the Impact of Delayed Access to Oncology Drugs on Patient Outcomes in Canada.Oncology and therapy · 2022Article
- The Equitable Implementation of Cystic Fibrosis Personalized Medicines in Canada.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Review
- Pharmaceutical companies' views on a health technology assessment (HTA) entity in Saudi Arabia.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2020Article
- Pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance (pCPA): Timelines Analysis and Policy Implications.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individuals who rely on public health payers to access new medicines can access fewer innovative medicines and must wait longer in Canada compared to major markets around the world. New medicines/indications approved by Health Canada and reviewed for eligibility for reimbursement by the Common Drug Review or the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review (CDR/pCODR) from the beginning of 2012 through to the end of December 2016 were analyzed, with data taken from the relevant bodies' websites and collected by IQVIA. This analysis investigated individual review segments - Notice of Compliance (NOC) to Health Technology Assessment (HTA) submission, HTA review time, pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance (pCPA) negotiation time, and public reimbursement decision time, and analyzed the trends of each over time and contributions to overall time to listing decisions. Average overall timelines for public reimbursement after NOC were long and most of this time is taken up by HTA and pCPA processes, at 236 and 273 days, respectively. This study confirms that Canadian public reimbursement delays from 2013-2014 to 2015-2016 lengthened from NOC to listing (Quebec + 53%, first provincial listing + 38%, and country-wide listing + 22%), reaching 499, 505, and 571 days, respectively. Over the same period, time from NOC to completion of HTA has increased by 33%, and time from post-HTA to first provincial listing by 44%. The pCPA process appears to be the main contributor to this increasing time trend, and although some provinces could be listing more quickly post-pCPA, they appear to be listing fewer products. Reasons for large delays in time to listing include the many-layered sequential process of reviews conducted before public drug plans decide whether to provide access to new innovative medicines. Although there has been some headway made in certain parts of the review processes (e.g., pre-NOC HTA), total time to listing continues to increase, seemingly due to the pCPA process and other additional review processes by drug plans. More clarity in the pCPA and provincial decision-making processes and better coordination between HTA, pCPA, and provincial decision-making processes is needed to increase predictability in the processes and reduce timelines for Canadian patients and manufacturers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.