ArticleFederal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS2019
Contrasting qSOFA and SIRS Criteria for Early Sepsis Identification in a Veteran Population.
Article in Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of the modified quick sequential organ failure assessment scoring system for triage and prognostic assessment in canine emergency and critically ill patients: a retrospective study.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- Opinion on "Artificial intelligence in sepsis early prediction and diagnosis using unstructured data in healthcare".Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Exhaled Nitric Oxide as a Marker of Infection and Sepsis in Emergency Department Patients.Emergency medicine international · 2025Article
- Predictive performance of NEWS and qSOFA in immunocompromised sepsis patients at the emergency department.Infection · 2024Observational
- Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Sepsis in Adult Patients Meeting Two or More Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Criteria.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Serial measurements of SIRS and SEP scores to identify unique phenotypes of sepsis.Internal and emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Prognostic evaluation of quick sequential organ failure assessment score in ICU patients with sepsis across different income settings.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Observational
- Development and Validation of Deep-Learning-Based Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Prediction System (DeepSEPS) Using Real-World ICU Data.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Combining C-reactive protein and quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) to improve prognostic accuracy for sepsis and mortality in adult inpatients: A systematic review.Health science reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Early Prediction of Sepsis Onset Using Neural Architecture Search Based on Genetic Algorithms.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment lacks sensitivity to be an effective replacement for the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome criteria for sepsis screening.
Identifiers
30983857PMC6453603W2990395440What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.