Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30983643›Full record

ArticleJournal of multivariate analysis2018

Robust network-based analysis of the associations between (epi)genetic measurements.

Cen Wu, Qingzhao Zhang, Yu Jiang, Shuangge Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multivariate analysis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Prognostic Value ofFrontiers in genetics · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Gene-Environment Interaction: A Variable Selection Perspective.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  20. Integration strategies of multi-omics data for machine learning analysis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cen Wu *Department of Statistics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
Qingzhao Zhang *School of Economics and the Wang Yanan Institute for Studies in Economics, Xiamen University.
Yu JiangDivision of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, 38111, USA.
Shuangge MaDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.

Funding

Novel methods for identifying genetic interactions in cancer prognosisR01CA204120 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Shuangge Ma · 2016 to 2026
$3.5M
Assisted Network-based Analysis of Cancer Gene Expression StudiesR03CA216017 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MA, SHUANGGE · 2017 to 2018
$168k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204120NCI NIH HHS R03 CA216017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With its important biological implications, modeling the associations of gene expression (GE) and copy number variation (CNV) has been extensively conducted. Such analysis is challenging because of the high data dimensionality, lack of knowledge regulating CNVs for a specific GE, different behaviors of the

Indexed as

Copy number variationGene expressionNetwork structurePartially linear modelPenalizationRobust estimation

Identifiers

PMID30983643
PMCPMC6456078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.