Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30983638›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics2018

Mediation analysis for count and zero-inflated count data without sequential ignorability and its application in dental studies.

Zijian Guo, Dylan S Small, Stuart A Gansky, Jing Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zijian GuoRutgers University, Piscataway, USA.
Dylan S SmallUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Stuart A GanskyUniversity of California, San Francisco, USA.
Jing ChengUniversity of California, San Francisco, USA.

Funding

Statistics and Data Coordinating CenterU54DE019285 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GANSKY, STUART A · 2008 to 2014
$24.9M
STUDY OF A NEW PAYMENT SYSTEM FOR MEDICAIDU54DE014261 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ISMAIL, AMID I. · 2001 to 2007
$9.3M
NIDCR NIH HHS U54 DE014261NIDCR NIH HHS U54 DE019285
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mediation analysis seeks to understand the mechanism by which a treatment affects an outcome. Count or zero-inflated count outcomes are common in many studies in which mediation analysis is of interest. For example, in dental studies, outcomes such as the number of decayed, missing and filled teeth are typically zero inflated. Existing mediation analysis approaches for count data often assume sequential ignorability of the mediator. This is often not plausible because the mediator is not randomized so unmeasured confounders are associated with the mediator and the outcome. We develop causal methods based on instrumental variable approaches for mediation analysis for count data possibly with many 0s that do not require the assumption of sequential ignorability. We first define the direct and indirect effect ratios for those data, and then we propose estimating equations and use empirical likelihood to estimate the direct and indirect effects consistently. A sensitivity analysis is proposed for violations of the instrumental variables exclusion restriction assumption. Simulation studies demonstrate that our method works well for different types of outcome under various settings. Our method is applied to a randomized dental caries prevention trial and a study of the effect of a massive flood in Bangladesh on children's diarrhoea.

Indexed as

Estimating equationInstrumental variableNegative binomial modelNeyman type A distributionPoisson modelSensitivity analysis

Identifiers

PMID30983638
PMCPMC6457264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.