Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30982943›Full record

ArticleEating and weight disorders : EWD2020

Integrating eating disorder and weight gain prevention: a pilot and feasibility trial of INSPIRE.

Courtney C Simpson, C Blair Burnette, Suzanne E Mazzeo

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03317587 (Inspiring Nutritious Selections and Positive Intentions Regarding Eating and Exercise), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03317587 nacompletednot on this map

Inspiring Nutritious Selections and Positive Intentions Regarding Eating and Exercise (INSPIRE)

TypeinterventionalSponsorVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRan2017 to 2017Enrolled29ConditionsObesity, Eating DisorderArmsINSPIRE
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Courtney C SimpsonDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, P.O. Box 842018, Richmond, VA, 23284-2018, USA. simpsoncc2@vcu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3320-4512
C Blair BurnetteDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, P.O. Box 842018, Richmond, VA, 23284-2018, USA.
Suzanne E MazzeoDepartments of Psychology and Pediatrics, Virginia Commonwealth University, P.O. Box 842018, Richmond, VA, 23284-2018, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe current study adapted evidence-based prevention programs to promote positive health behaviors among racially and ethnically diverse young adult women. Two successful programs (The Body Project and the Healthy Weight Intervention) were integrated to evaluate their feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy in reducing risk for both eating pathology and weight gain. Intervention features extended the previous prevention efforts by emphasizing broad appearance ideals to enhance relevancy for women of color and incorporating distress tolerance and emotion regulation skills training.

methodIndividuals were excluded if they met criteria for an eating disorder diagnosis and/or obesity, as this was a prevention project. 27 young adult women participated (M age = 18.59; SD = 1.01). The following racial/ethnic groups were represented: 48.1% White, 25.9% Asian, 22.2% Black, and 3.7% Latina. After each meeting, participants completed satisfaction measures and therapists assessed intervention feasibility. Participants also completed comprehensive questionnaires at pretest (baseline), posttest (8 weeks), and 4-week follow-up.

resultsDescriptive statistics and content analyses of open-ended questions indicated that the intervention was both acceptable and feasible. Hierarchical linear models evaluating within-subject change over time indicated reductions in several risk factors that were sustained at follow-up: eating pathology, appearance dissatisfaction, thin-ideal internalization, restrained eating, negative affect, emotion dysregulation, and fat intake. BMI did not change from pretest to posttest; however, BMI increased from posttest to follow-up (mean weight increase = 0.34 kg).

conclusionResults suggest that a prevention program designed to be more culturally sensitive is feasible and acceptable. Findings provide preliminary support for reducing the risk of eating pathology and promoting positive health behaviors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Time series with intervention, Level IV.

trial registrationClinicalTrails.gov ID: NCT03317587.

Indexed as

Health PromotionAdolescentBody ImageEmotional RegulationEmotionsEvidence-Based PracticeFeasibility StudiesFeeding and Eating DisordersFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansObesityPilot ProjectsRisk FactorsWeight GainYoung AdultBody imageDiversityEating disordersPreventionWeight gain

Identifiers

PMID30982943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.