Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30982881›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2019

Physical workload and bodily fatigue after work: cross-sectional study among 5000 workers.

Rúni Bláfoss, Emil Sundstrup, Markus D Jakobsen, Mikkel Brandt, Hans Bay, Lars L Andersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Strategies for positive leadership attitude among operational managers post-COVID-19 at primary health care clinics in the City of Johannesburg.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Association between split shift work and work-related injury and disease absence.Annals of occupational and environmental medicine · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rúni BláfossMusculoskeletal Disorders and Physical Workload, National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Emil SundstrupMusculoskeletal Disorders and Physical Workload, National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Markus D JakobsenMusculoskeletal Disorders and Physical Workload, National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mikkel BrandtMusculoskeletal Disorders and Physical Workload, National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hans BayMusculoskeletal Disorders and Physical Workload, National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars L AndersenMusculoskeletal Disorders and Physical Workload, National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersistent bodily fatigue after working days may indicate an imbalance between work demands and capacity of the workers. This study aimed to investigate associations between physical exposures at work and bodily fatigue after work.

methodsDanish workers with physical work (N=5377) answered questions about various physical exposures during work and bodily fatigue after work in the 2010 round of the Danish Work Environment Cohort Study. Associations were modeled using binary logistic regression controlled for various confounders.

resultsMean age among the younger (<50 years) and older (≥50 years) workers was 36 and 56 years, respectively. Younger and older workers exposed to various physical exposures (e.g. 'bending/twisting the back') for more than a quarter of the workday were more fatigued after work. An exposure-response relationship was observed between the number of physical exposures and bodily fatigue, with odds ratios (OR) for fatigue in the body among younger workers being 1.01 (95%CI 0.63-1.63), 1.59 (95%CI 1.01-2.50), 2.37 (95%CI 1.54-3.66) and 2.84 (95%CI 1.85-5.36) for 1, 2, 3 and ≥4 types of combined physical exposures, respectively. Correspondingly, for older workers, ORs were 1.95 (95%CI 1.09-3.51), 4.06 (95%CI 2.32-7.12), 4.10 (95%CI 2.28-7.37) and 4.90 (95%CI 2.72-8.82) for 1, 2, 3 and ≥4 exposures, respectively.

conclusionWhile some of the single factor exposures were associated with increased bodily fatigue, the most marked associations were found when summing the number of different exposures. These results indicate that workplaces should focus on the sum of combined physical exposures rather than focusing solely on single exposures.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesFatigueFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedWorkload

Identifiers

PMID30982881
PMCPMC6761836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.