Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30982870›Full record

SynthesisThe American journal of clinical nutrition2019

Infant milk-feeding practices and food allergies, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, and asthma throughout the life span: a systematic review.

Darcy Güngör, Perrine Nadaud, Concetta C LaPergola, Carol Dreibelbis, Yat Ping Wong, Nancy Terry, Steve A Abrams, Leila Beker, Tova Jacobovits, Kirsi M Järvinen and 6 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 60 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Prospective associations of infant food exposures and appetitive traits with early childhood diet quality.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Darcy GüngörPanum Group, Bethesda, MD.
Perrine NadaudPanum Group, Bethesda, MD.
Concetta C LaPergolaPanum Group, Bethesda, MD.
Carol DreibelbisPanum Group, Bethesda, MD.
Yat Ping WongUSDA, Food and Nutrition Service, Alexandria, VA.
Nancy TerryNational Institutes of Health Library, Bethesda, MD.
Steve A AbramsDell Medical School at the University of Texas, Austin, TX.
Leila BekerUS Food and Drug Administration, contractor, College Park, MD.
Tova JacobovitsUS Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD.
Kirsi M JärvinenUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
Laurie A Nommsen-RiversUniversity of Cincinnati College of Allied Health Sciences, Cincinnati, OH.
Kimberly O O'BrienDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Emily OkenDivision of Chronic Disease Research Across the Lifecourse, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA.
Rafael Pérez-EscamillaDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT.
Ekhard E ZieglerPanum Group, Bethesda, MD.
Joanne M SpahnUSDA, Food and Nutrition Service, Alexandria, VA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the Pregnancy and Birth to 24 Months Project, the USDA and Department of Health and Human Services initiated a review of evidence on diet and health in these populations.

objectivesThe aim of these systematic reviews was to examine the relation of 1) never versus ever feeding human milk, 2) shorter versus longer durations of any human milk feeding, 3) shorter versus longer durations of exclusive human milk feeding prior to infant formula introduction, 4) feeding a lower versus higher intensity of human milk to mixed-fed infants, and 5) feeding a higher intensity of human milk by bottle versus breast with food allergies, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, and asthma.

methodsThe Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review team conducted systematic reviews with external experts. We searched CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, and PubMed for articles published between January 1980 and March 2016, dual-screened the results according to predetermined criteria, extracted data from and assessed the risk of bias for each included study, qualitatively synthesized the evidence, developed conclusion statements, and graded the strength of the evidence.

resultsThe systematic reviews numbered 1-5 above included 44, 35, 1, 0, and 0 articles, respectively. Moderate, mostly observational, evidence suggests that 1) never versus ever being fed human milk is associated with higher risk of childhood asthma, and 2) among children and adolescents who were fed human milk as infants, shorter versus longer durations of any human milk feeding are associated with higher risk of asthma. Limited evidence does not suggest associations between 1) never versus ever being fed human milk and atopic dermatitis in childhood or 2) the duration of any human milk feeding and allergic rhinitis and atopic dermatitis in childhood.

conclusionsModerate evidence suggests that feeding human milk for short durations or not at all is associated with higher childhood asthma risk. Evidence on food allergies, allergic rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis is limited.

Indexed as

AsthmaDermatitis, AtopicFeeding BehaviorFood HypersensitivityInfant FormulaMilk, HumanRhinitis, AllergicAdolescentBreast FeedingChildDietHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant Nutritional Physiological Phenomenaallergic rhinitisasthmaatopic dermatitisbreastfeedingchildfood allergyhuman milkinfantsystematic reviewtoddler

Identifiers

PMID30982870
PMCPMC6500928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.