Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30982601›Full record

ArticleCell2019

Self-Organized Nuclear Positioning Synchronizes the Cell Cycle in Drosophila Embryos.

Victoria E Deneke, Alberto Puliafito, Daniel Krueger, Avaneesh V Narla, Alessandro De Simone, Luca Primo, Massimo Vergassola, Stefano De Renzis, Stefano Di Talia

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A phase oscillator model of cell cycles reveals nuclear density control in a branched fungal network.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Signal control during tissue regeneration in adult animals.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Optogenetic enzymes: A deep dive into design and impact.Current opinion in structural biology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Flow, sense and divide.Nature cell biology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Victoria E DenekeDepartment of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Alberto PuliafitoCandiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS, Laboratory of Cell Migration, Candiolo Torino 10060, Italy; Department of Oncology, Università di Torino, Torino 10060, Italy.
Daniel KruegerEMBL Heidelberg, Meyerhofstrasse 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Avaneesh V NarlaDepartment of Physics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Alessandro De SimoneDepartment of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Luca PrimoCandiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS, Laboratory of Cell Migration, Candiolo Torino 10060, Italy; Department of Oncology, Università di Torino, Torino 10060, Italy.
Massimo VergassolaDepartment of Physics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Stefano De RenzisEMBL Heidelberg, Meyerhofstrasse 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Stefano Di TaliaDepartment of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Electronic address: stefano.ditalia@duke.edu.
Candiolo Cancer Institute · ITDuke Medical Center · USEuropean Molecular Biology Organization · DEUniversity of California System · USDuke University · US

Funding

Time-keeping mechanisms of embryonic cell cyclesR01GM122936 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DI TALIA, STEFANO · 2017 to 2023
$2.0M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM122936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The synchronous cleavage divisions of early embryogenesis require coordination of the cell-cycle oscillator, the dynamics of the cytoskeleton, and the cytoplasm. Yet, it remains unclear how spatially restricted biochemical signals are integrated with physical properties of the embryo to generate collective dynamics. Here, we show that synchronization of the cell cycle in Drosophila embryos requires accurate nuclear positioning, which is regulated by the cell-cycle oscillator through cortical contractility and cytoplasmic flows. We demonstrate that biochemical oscillations are initiated by local Cdk1 inactivation and spread through the activity of phosphatase PP1 to generate cortical myosin II gradients. These gradients cause cortical and cytoplasmic flows that control proper nuclear positioning. Perturbations of PP1 activity and optogenetic manipulations of cortical actomyosin disrupt nuclear spreading, resulting in loss of cell-cycle synchrony. We conclude that mitotic synchrony is established by a self-organized mechanism that integrates the cell-cycle oscillator and embryo mechanics.

Indexed as

ActomyosinAnimalsCDC2 Protein KinaseCell CycleCell NucleusCell Nucleus DivisionCytokinesisCytoplasmCytoskeletonDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEmbryonic DevelopmentEmbryo, NonmammalianMicrotubulesMitosisMyosin Type IIActomyosinCDC2 Protein KinaseCdk1 protein, DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsMyosin Type IIPhosphoric Monoester Hydrolasesactomyosin networkcell cyclecollective dynamicscortical contractilitycytoplasmic flowsembryonic developmentnuclear positioningoptogeneticsself-organizationsynchronization

Identifiers

PMID30982601
PMCPMC6499673
OpenAlexW2937142968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.