Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30982599›Full record

ArticleCell2019

Primate Amygdala Neurons Simulate Decision Processes of Social Partners.

Fabian Grabenhorst, Raymundo Báez-Mendoza, Wilfried Genest, Gustavo Deco, Wolfram Schultz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Primate neuroethology: a new synthesis.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Social Risk Coding by Amygdala Activity and Connectivity with the Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Decision-Making with Predictions of Others' Likely and Unlikely Choices in the Human Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fabian GrabenhorstDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DY, UK. Electronic address: fg292@cam.ac.uk.
Raymundo Báez-MendozaDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DY, UK.
Wilfried GenestDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DY, UK.
Gustavo DecoCenter for Brain and Cognition, Department of Technology and Information, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Carrer Tànger, 122-140, 08018 Barcelona, Spain; Institució Catalana de la Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Universitat Barcelona, Passeig Lluís Companys 23, 08010 Barcelona, Spain.
Wolfram SchultzDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DY, UK.

Funding

The Neurobiology of Social Decision-Making: Social Inference and ContextP50MH094258 · NIMH · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI O'DOHERTY, JOHN P · 2012 to 2021
$18.6M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH094258Wellcome Trust 095495Wellcome Trust 204811/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 206207/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By observing their social partners, primates learn about reward values of objects. Here, we show that monkeys' amygdala neurons derive object values from observation and use these values to simulate a partner monkey's decision process. While monkeys alternated making reward-based choices, amygdala neurons encoded object-specific values learned from observation. Dynamic activities converted these values to representations of the recorded monkey's own choices. Surprisingly, the same activity patterns unfolded spontaneously before partner's choices in separate neurons, as if these neurons simulated the partner's decision-making. These "simulation neurons" encoded signatures of mutual-inhibitory decision computation, including value comparisons and value-to-choice conversions, resulting in accurate predictions of partner's choices. Population decoding identified differential contributions of amygdala subnuclei. Biophysical modeling of amygdala circuits showed that simulation neurons emerge naturally from convergence between object-value neurons and self-other neurons. By simulating decision computations during observation, these neurons could allow primates to reconstruct their social partners' mental states.

Indexed as

AmygdalaAnimalsBehavior, AnimalChoice BehaviorDecision MakingInterpersonal RelationsLearningMacaca mulattaMaleNeuronsRewardattractor networkautismdecision-makingmirror neuronobservational learningrewardsocial cognitiontheory of mind

Identifiers

PMID30982599
PMCPMC6506276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.