Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30982387›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of men's health

An Evaluation of Follow-Up Activities of Participants From an Urban Prostate Cancer Screening Event.

Bettina F Drake, Marquita W Lewis-Thames, Ambriah Brown, Danielle Rancilio, Veronica Hicks

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of men's health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Prostate Cancer-Research Advances in Early Detection.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bettina F Drake1 Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, Division of Public Health Sciences, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Marquita W Lewis-Thames1 Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, Division of Public Health Sciences, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5909-7167
Ambriah Brown2 St. Louis Regional Health Commission, MO, USA.
Danielle Rancilio1 Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, Division of Public Health Sciences, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Veronica Hicks1 Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, Division of Public Health Sciences, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

Training ProgramU54CA153460 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI COLDITZ, GRAHAM A. · 2010 to 2015
$5.3M
Postdoctoral Training in Cancer Prevention and ControlT32CA190194 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GRAHAM A. COLDITZ, AIMEE S JAMES · 2014 to 2026
$4.7M
Prostate Cancer Survivor Outreach and Education Message Testing StudyU01CA114594 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI COLDITZ, GRAHAM A. · 2005 to 2009
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA190194NCI NIH HHS U01 CA114594NCI NIH HHS U54 CA153460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate follow-up activities completed by participants attending community prostate cancer (PCa) screening events. On-site surveys were collected from participants of 17 free PCa screening events from 2007 to 2011 in the St. Louis, MO metropolitan area. Follow-up action surveys were mailed to all on-site participants to assess medical (i.e., made an appointment with a doctor, got additional testing for PCa, made an appointment to be screened) and nonmedical activities (i.e., sought social support, health information-seeking, health behavior modifications) completed after the PCa screening event. Further, t tests and chi-square tests characterized participant information from the on-site survey and within each follow-up activity category for the mailed surveys. Among 1,088 on-site community PCa screening participants, the mean age was 50 years old, 94% were Black, and 30% responded to the mailed follow-up action survey. For the recorded follow-up activities, 65% of participants reported medically reported activities, of which "made an appointment to get a yearly physical" was the most common action (29%). Health behavior modifications were the most common nonmedically related activities (44%). Health information-seeking behaviors were the least reported follow-up action (22%). Men with higher incomes, married, with health insurance, and a primary care physician, most often participated in post-PSA screening activities, namely medically-related and social support activities. Understanding the most common activities completed by participants of a community PCa screening suggests the effectiveness of community events to re-engage underserved populations in the health-care system and provides insight on acceptable health promotion opportunities.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareDemographyEarly Detection of CancerFollow-Up StudiesHealth BehaviorHealth PromotionHumansInformation Seeking BehaviorMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedMissouriProstatic NeoplasmsSocial SupportSurveys and QuestionnairesUrban PopulationAfrican-Americanhealth educationminorityprostate cancerPSAscreening

Identifiers

PMID30982387
PMCPMC6463237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.