Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30982337›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2019

Quantitative pancreatic MRI: a pathology-based review.

Manil D Chouhan, Louisa Firmin, Samantha Read, Zahir Amin, Stuart A Taylor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. T1 Mapping of the Abdomen, From theAJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2025
    Review
  9. Advances in MRI of Chronic Pancreatitis.Advances in clinical radiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Evaluation of pancreatic steatosis prevalence and anthropometric measurements using non-contrast computed tomography.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Manil D Chouhan1 University College London (UCL) Centre for Medical Imaging, Division of Medicine, UCL , London , UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5903-1002
Louisa Firmin2 Department of Imaging, University College London Hospitals (UCLH) NHS Foundation Trust , London , UK.
Samantha Read2 Department of Imaging, University College London Hospitals (UCLH) NHS Foundation Trust , London , UK.
Zahir Amin2 Department of Imaging, University College London Hospitals (UCLH) NHS Foundation Trust , London , UK.
Stuart A Taylor1 University College London (UCL) Centre for Medical Imaging, Division of Medicine, UCL , London , UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MRI plays an important role in the clinical management of pancreatic disorders and interpretation is reliant on qualitative assessment of anatomy. Conventional sequences capturing pancreatic structure can however be adapted to yield quantitative measures which provide more diagnostic information, with a view to increasing diagnostic accuracy, improving patient stratification, providing robust non-invasive outcome measures for therapeutic trials and ultimately personalizing patient care. In this review, we evaluate the use of established techniques such as secretin-enhanced MR cholangiopancreatography, diffusion-weighted imaging,

Indexed as

HumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPancreasPancreatic Diseases

Identifiers

PMID30982337
PMCPMC6636277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.