Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30982212›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2019

Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis: Clinical Manifestation, Natural Course, and Evaluation of Treatment with Corticosteroids and Vedolizumab.

Tanja Grandinetti, Luc Biedermann, Christian Bussmann, Alex Straumann, Petr Hruz

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Determination of Biopsy Yield That Optimally Detects Eosinophilic Gastritis and/or Duodenitis in a Randomized Trial of Lirentelimab.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2022
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Research progress on risk factors for poor prognosis in pediatric non-esophageal eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorder].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Endoscopic Features of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Diseases.Immunology and allergy clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  16. [Clinical characteristics of 267 children with eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease: a multicenter study].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tanja GrandinettiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Luc BiedermannDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christian BussmannInstitute of Pathology Viollier, Basel, Switzerland.
Alex StraumannDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Petr HruzDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland. petr.hruz@usb.ch.ORCID 0000-0003-2767-0445
University Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE) is a rare, chronic inflammatory condition of the gastrointestinal tract. Little is known about its natural history and treatment outcomes. The aims of our analysis were to describe clinical presentation, response to current medical treatments, and to evaluate the response of refractory EGE to anti-integrin therapy.

methodsPatients with confirmed diagnosis of EGE fulfilling the diagnostic criteria: (1) the presence of gastrointestinal symptoms, (2) dense eosinophilic infiltration of the gastrointestinal mucosa, and (3) exclusion of other conditions leading to gastrointestinal eosinophilia were included in this analysis. In patients non-responding to corticosteroids and/or anti-TNF treatment the integrin blocker vedolizumab was used.

resultsEGE patients (n = 22) were predominantly female (63%) with a median age at diagnosis of 41.5 years. The most frequent symptoms were abdominal pain (100%), diarrhea (59%), nausea/vomiting (36%), and bloating (27%). No pathognomonic endoscopic alterations were found. Eosinophilic infiltration was observed in the majority of patients in more than one segment. Patients were treated with systemic steroids, topical, and enteral release steroids in 21/22 (95%) patients, proton pump inhibitors in 7/22 (32%), TNFα inhibitors in 3/22 (14%), and vedolizumab in 4/22 (18%) patients. In 3/4 of steroid-refractory patients vedolizumab induced a clinical and histological improvement.

conclusionsThe combination of highly variable clinical presentation, subtle endoscopic abnormalities, and involvement of several GI segments undermines the difficulty to diagnose EGE and the need for structured biopsy sampling. Corticosteroids were efficient in the majority of patients to induce remission. Response to the integrin blocker vedolizumab suggests further assessment in refractory cases.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdultAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedChildEnteritisEosinophiliaFemaleGastritisGastrointestinal AgentsHumansMaleMiddle AgedRemission InductionRetrospective StudiesAdrenal Cortex HormonesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedGastrointestinal AgentsvedolizumabEosinophilic gastroenteritisSteroid-refractoryVedolizumab

Identifiers

PMID30982212
OpenAlexW2937261885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.