Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30982210›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2019

Minichromosomal Maintenance Component Complex 5 (MCM5) as a Marker of Barrett's Esophagus-Related Neoplasia: A Feasibility Study.

M Everson, C Magee, D Alzoubaidi, S Brogden, D Graham, L B Lovat, M Novelli, R Haidry

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M EversonDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
C MageeDepartment of Gastroenterology, University College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK.
D AlzoubaidiDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
S BrogdenDepartment of Gastroenterology, University College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK.
D GrahamDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
L B LovatDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
M NovelliDepartment of Pathology, University College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
R HaidryDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK. rehan.haidry@nhs.net.
University College Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe endoscopic detection of esophageal cancer is suboptimal in both patients referred with dyspeptic symptoms and those enrolled in Barrett's surveillance programs. MCM5 expression in cells collected from gastric fluid may be correlated with the presence of dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. Analysis of this biomarker may improve the detection of cancer.

methodsSixty-one patients were enrolled at a single UK referral center. From each patient, 5-10 ml of gastric fluid was aspirated endoscopically. Patients were categorized according to their histology, normal, non-dysplastic Barrett's (NDBE), high-grade dysplastic Barrett's (HGD), and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). All histology was confirmed by Seattle protocol biopsies or endoscopic mucosal resection. Samples were centrifuged, and the cell pellet was lysed. MCM5 expression levels were quantified using a proprietary immunoassay. The mean MCM5 expression was compared between groups by Kruskal-Wallis test. ROC curves were also used to assess diagnostic utility.

resultsThe mean expression of MCM5 increases as patients progress from a normal esophagus to NDBE, HGD, and EAC (14.4; 49.8; 112.3; and 154.1, respectively). There was a significant difference in the MCM5 expression of patients with a normal esophagus compared to those with EAC (p = 0.04). There was a trend toward higher MCM5 expression in patients with EAC compared to those with NDBE (p = 0.34). MCM5 expression was a fair discriminator (AUC 0.70 [95% CI 0.57-0.83]) between patients without neoplasia (normal and NDBE) and those with early neoplasia (HGD and EAC).

conclusionMCM5 expression in gastric fluid samples can differentiate patients with a histologically normal esophagus compared to those with early adenocarcinoma. Larger, powered studies are needed to assess whether it can be used to differentiate those with HGD from NDBE.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaBarrett EsophagusEsophageal NeoplasmsPrecancerous ConditionsBiomarkersBiopsyCell Cycle ProteinsDisease ProgressionDNA ReplicationEarly Detection of CancerEndoscopy, Digestive SystemFeasibility StudiesFemaleGastric JuiceHumansMaleBiomarkersCell Cycle ProteinsMCM5 protein, humanBarrett’s esophagusBiomarkersEndoscopyEsophageal cancer

Identifiers

PMID30982210
OpenAlexW2939436994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.