ReviewNeurosurgical review2020
Stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy for acoustic neuromas.
Review in Neurosurgical review, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Failure of gamma knife radiosurgery for sporadic vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Vestibular schwannoma clinical prognostic factors and nomogram construction using SEER database.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Epidemiology of Male Hypogonadism.Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America · 2022Review
- Long term results of primary radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuromas are benign intracranial tumors with indolent natural history. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment and only after the introduction of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), radiotherapy emerged as an alternative viable option. In this review, we focused on SRS or conventionally fractionated stereotactic radiotherapeutic (FSRT) approaches. We described the results of different doses used for SRS and FSRT, the current status, and a comparison between the two radiotherapy approaches. Stereotactic radiotherapy techniques aim to control tumor growth with minimal toxicity. SRS using either a cobalt unit or a linear accelerator has given high rates of tumor control and of cranial nerve function preservation with marginal doses range of 12-14 Gy. Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) is optimal for tumors larger than 3 cm. Doses as low as 50.4 Gy provide excellent control rates and low morbidity. Overall, both SRS and FSRT are equally effective and safe options for neuroma patients who do not need immediate surgical decompression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.