ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2019
Treatment of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF): the Phenotype-Guided Approach.
Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Advances in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review of Therapeutic and Mechanistic Evidence.Vascular health and risk management · 2026Pooled it
- Large animal models to study effectiveness of therapy devices in the treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).Heart failure reviews · 2024Review
- Phenotype-Specific Outcome and Treatment Response in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction with Comorbid Hypertension and Diabetes: A 12-Month Multicentered Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Theoretical considerations for a left atrial pump in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Heart failure reviews · 2023Review
- Does the Measurement of Ejection Fraction Still Make Sense in the HFpEF Framework? What Recent Trials Suggest.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Global status and trends in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction over the period 2009-2020: A bibliometric analysis.Medicine · 2022Article
- Crossroads between Estrogen Loss, Obesity, and Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2021Review
- Hemodynamic Heterogeneity of Reduced Cardiac Reserve Unmasked by Volumetric Exercise Echocardiography.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Clinical Phenotypes and Age-Related Differences in Presentation, Treatment, and Outcome of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Vietnamese Multicenter Research.Cardiology research and practice · 2021Article
- Diving Into the Diagnostic Score Algorithms of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
- Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: the Major Unmet Need in Cardiology.Korean circulation journal · 2020Review
- Potential use of ubiquinol and d-ribose in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2020Review
- Iron Deficiency: Impact on Functional Capacity and Quality of Life in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Mode of Action of Shan-Zhu-Yu (Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2020Article
- Sarcopenic Obesity in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2020Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The syndrome of heart failure with preserved ejection (HFpEF) continues to rise in prevalence without persuasive evidence of current pharmacologic interventions that can reduce mortality. Clinical trials thus far have generally enrolled "all-comers" with the clinical syndrome of heart failure and objective evidence of a preserved ejection fraction. However, HFpEF is increasingly understood to be a heterogeneous syndrome likely borne from the interplay of genetic predisposition, lifestyle factors, and high burden of associated comorbidities with each contributing to a variety of incompletely understood pathophysiologic abnormalities. Complicating management further, such abnormalities appear to be present to varying degrees among individual patients. Ongoing studies, along with the use of computational statistics/machine learning, offer the hope of clarifying the pathophysiological substrates giving rise to the syndrome of HFpEF in different patient subsets. With better understanding of the syndrome's underpinnings, there will be the potential for development of truly targeted therapies. However, for now, there is substantial evidence for the use of currently available pharmacologic device and lifestyle therapy for the optimized management of patients. Such therapy can be tailored to presently identifiable patient clusters-called "phenotypes"-distinguished by both the presence of predominant presenting symptoms and/or predominant comorbidity profiles. Examples of clinical presentation phenotypes include lung congestion, chronotropic incompetence, pulmonary hypertension, or skeletal muscle weakness as predominant features. Additionally, such patients may have underlying metabolic syndrome, systemic (arterial) hypertension, renal dysfunction, atrial fibrillation, and/or coronary artery disease as principal underlying comorbidities. Here, we review a "phenotype-guided" approach to the management of patients with HFpEF, based on a stepwise method of making the HFpEF diagnosis, identifying the prominent sources of organ dysfunction, and treating accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.