Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30982102›Full record

ReviewCancer metastasis reviews2019

Intracellular pH dynamics and charge-changing somatic mutations in cancer.

Katharine A White, Kyle Kisor, Diane L Barber

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer metastasis reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Emerging links between endosomal pH and cancer.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katharine A WhiteHarper Cancer Research Institute, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, South Bend, IN, 46617, USA.
Kyle KisorDepartment of Cell and Tissue Biology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Diane L BarberDepartment of Cell and Tissue Biology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA. diane.barber@ucsf.edu.
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Notre Dame · US

Funding

Roles for Intracellular pH Dynamics in CancerR01CA197855 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DIANE L BARBER · 2016 to 2026
$4.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197855
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An unresolved question critical for understanding cancer is how recurring somatic mutations are retained and how selective pressures drive retention. Increased intracellular pH (pHi) is common to most cancers and is an early event in cancer development. Recent work shows that recurrent somatic mutations can confer an adaptive gain in pH sensing to mutant proteins, enhancing tumorigenic phenotypes specifically at the increased pHi of cancer. Newly identified amino acid mutation signatures in cancer suggest charge-changing mutations define and shape the mutational landscape of cancer. Taken together, these results support a new perspective on the functional significance of somatic mutations in cancer. In this review, we explore existing data and new directions for better understanding how changes in dynamic pH sensing by somatic mutation might be conferring a fitness advantage to the high pH of cancer.

Indexed as

MutationErbB ReceptorsHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationModels, MolecularNeoplasmsEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsIntracellular pH dynamicsOncogenespH sensingSomatic mutations

Identifiers

PMID30982102
PMCPMC12916123
OpenAlexW2940125596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.