Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30981990›Full record

Trial reportGut2020

Personalised surveillance for serrated polyposis syndrome: results from a prospective 5-year international cohort study.

Arne Gc Bleijenberg, Joep Eg IJspeert, Yasmijn J van Herwaarden, Sabela Carballal, María Pellisé, Gerhard Jung, Tanya M Bisseling, Iris D Nagtegaal, Monique E van Leerdam, Niels van Lelyveld and 10 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gut, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04906343 (Endoscopic Surveillance in Patients With Serrated Polyposis Syndrome and Low-risk of Advanced Neoplasia.), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04906343 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Endoscopic Surveillance in Patients With Serrated Polyposis Syndrome and Low-risk of Advanced Neoplasia.

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Universitario de MóstolesRan2021 to 2024Enrolled144ConditionsColonic Polyp, Colonic Neoplasms, Colonic Cancer, Serrated PolyposisArmsColonoscopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. How many is too many? Polyposis syndromes and what to do next.Current opinion in gastroenterology · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Arne Gc BleijenbergGastroenterology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joep Eg IJspeertGastroenterology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Yasmijn J van HerwaardenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sabela CarballalGastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
María PelliséGastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Gerhard JungGastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3675-312X
Tanya M BisselingDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Iris D NagtegaalDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Monique E van LeerdamGastroenterology and Hepatology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Niels van LelyveldGastroenterology and Hepatology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Xavier BessaGastroenterology, Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mediques, Barcelona, Spain.
Francisco Rodríguez-MorantaGastroenterology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Barbara BastiaansenGastroenterology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Willemijn de KlaverGastroenterology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Liseth RiveroGastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Manon Cw SpaanderGastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9103-9757
Jan Jacob KoornstraGastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8400-2131
Luis BujandaGastroenterology, Donostia Hospital, San Sebastian, Spain.
Francesc Balaguer *Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Evelien Dekker *Gastroenterology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4363-0745

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsSerrated polyposis syndrome (SPS) is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). International guidelines recommend surveillance intervals of 1-2 years. However, yearly surveillance likely leads to overtreatment for many. We prospectively assessed a surveillance protocol aiming to safely reduce the burden of colonoscopies.

methodsBetween 2013 and 2018, we enrolled SPS patients from nine Dutch and Spanish hospitals. Patients were surveilled using a protocol appointing either a 1-year or 2-year interval after each surveillance colonoscopy, based on polyp burden. Primary endpoint was the 5-year cumulative incidence of CRC and advanced neoplasia (AN) during surveillance.

resultsWe followed 271 SPS patients for a median of 3.6 years. During surveillance, two patients developed CRC (cumulative 5-year incidence 1.3%[95% CI 0% to 3.2%]). The 5-year AN incidence was 44% (95% CI 37% to 52%), and was lower for patients with SPS type III (26%) than for patients diagnosed with type I (53%) or type I and III (59%, p<0.001). Most patients were recommended a 2-year interval, and those recommended a 2-year interval were not at increased risk of AN: AN incidence after a 2-year recommendation was 15.6% compared with 24.4% after a 1-year recommendation (OR 0.57, p=0.08).

conclusionRisk stratification substantially reduced colonoscopy burden while achieving CRC incidence similar to previous studies. AN incidence is considerable in SPS patients, but extension of surveillance intervals was not associated with increased AN in those identified as low-risk by the protocol. We identified SPS type III patients as low-risk group that might benefit from even less frequent surveillance. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study was registered on http://www.trialregister.nl; trial-ID NTR4609.

Indexed as

Adenomatous Polyposis ColiAgedCohort StudiesColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMedical OveruseMiddle AgedNetherlandsPopulation SurveillancePrevalenceProspective Studiescolonic polypscolorectal cancerpolyposis

Identifiers

PMID30981990
PMCPMC6943249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.