Trial reportGut2020
Personalised surveillance for serrated polyposis syndrome: results from a prospective 5-year international cohort study.
Trial report in Gut, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04906343 (Endoscopic Surveillance in Patients With Serrated Polyposis Syndrome and Low-risk of Advanced Neoplasia.), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Endoscopic Surveillance in Patients With Serrated Polyposis Syndrome and Low-risk of Advanced Neoplasia.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Guideline
- Endoscopic Surveillance in Serrated Polyposis Syndrome, Two or Three-Year Intervals: A Non-inferiority Randomized Trial.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Trial
- The 'other' colonic polyposis syndromes-evolving insights and guidance for endoscopists.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Review
- Identifying Serrated Polyposis Syndrome in a Large Health-Care System.Gastro hep advances · 2026Review
- Serrated Polyposis Syndrome: A Narrative Review from Clinical Recognition to Risk-Adapted Cancer Prevention.International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
- Overview of serrated polyposis syndrome from pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Health anxiety and work loss in patients diagnosed with serrated polyposis syndrome: A cross sectional study.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Germline pathogenic variants in RNF43 in patients with and without serrated polyposis syndrome.Familial cancer · 2024Article
- Serrated polyposis syndrome: defining the epidemiology and predicting the risk of dysplasia.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Feasibility and Safety of Endoscopic Control for Patients with Serrated Polyposis Syndrome.Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Epigenome-Wide DNA Methylation Profiling of Normal Mucosa Reveals HLA-F Hypermethylation as a Biomarker Candidate for Serrated Polyposis Syndrome.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2022Article
- Clinicopathological characteristics of colorectal serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS): results of a multicenter study by the SPS Study Group in Japan.Journal of gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Colorectal carcinoma occurring via the adenoma-carcinoma pathway in patients with serrated polyposis syndrome.Journal of gastroenterology · 2022Article
- How many is too many? Polyposis syndromes and what to do next.Current opinion in gastroenterology · 2022Review
- Danish guidelines for management of non-APC-associated hereditary polyposis syndromes.Hereditary cancer in clinical practice · 2021Review
- Ulcerative Colitis With Concomitant Serrated Polyposis Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review.Cureus · 2021Article
- Review
- Article
- [Gastrointestinal polyposis syndromes].Der Internist · 2021Review
- Diagnosis, epidemiology and management of serrated polyposis syndrome: a comprehensive review of the literature.American journal of translational research · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection:2020
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsSerrated polyposis syndrome (SPS) is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). International guidelines recommend surveillance intervals of 1-2 years. However, yearly surveillance likely leads to overtreatment for many. We prospectively assessed a surveillance protocol aiming to safely reduce the burden of colonoscopies.
methodsBetween 2013 and 2018, we enrolled SPS patients from nine Dutch and Spanish hospitals. Patients were surveilled using a protocol appointing either a 1-year or 2-year interval after each surveillance colonoscopy, based on polyp burden. Primary endpoint was the 5-year cumulative incidence of CRC and advanced neoplasia (AN) during surveillance.
resultsWe followed 271 SPS patients for a median of 3.6 years. During surveillance, two patients developed CRC (cumulative 5-year incidence 1.3%[95% CI 0% to 3.2%]). The 5-year AN incidence was 44% (95% CI 37% to 52%), and was lower for patients with SPS type III (26%) than for patients diagnosed with type I (53%) or type I and III (59%, p<0.001). Most patients were recommended a 2-year interval, and those recommended a 2-year interval were not at increased risk of AN: AN incidence after a 2-year recommendation was 15.6% compared with 24.4% after a 1-year recommendation (OR 0.57, p=0.08).
conclusionRisk stratification substantially reduced colonoscopy burden while achieving CRC incidence similar to previous studies. AN incidence is considerable in SPS patients, but extension of surveillance intervals was not associated with increased AN in those identified as low-risk by the protocol. We identified SPS type III patients as low-risk group that might benefit from even less frequent surveillance. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study was registered on http://www.trialregister.nl; trial-ID NTR4609.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.