Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30981679›Full record

ReviewRedox biology2019

S-nitrosothiols and H

Adriana Karla Cardoso Amorim Reis, Arnold Stern, Hugo Pequeno Monteiro

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Redox biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. NO- and HNitric oxide : biology and chemistry · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Hydrogen Sulfide Biology and Its Role in Cancer.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  10. Overexpression of CBS/HCancer cell international · 2022
    Article
  11. HBiomolecules · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Role of hydrogen sulfide donors in cancer development and progression.International journal of biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Adriana Karla Cardoso Amorim ReisDepartment of Chemistry, Institute of Environmental, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences - Universidade Federal de São Paulo - Campus Diadema, São Paulo, Brazil.
Arnold SternNew York University, School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: arnold.stern@nyumc.org.
Hugo Pequeno MonteiroDepartment of Biochemistry, Center for Cellular and Molecular Therapy - Universidade Federal de São Paulo - Campus São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: hugo.monteiro@unifesp.br.
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BRNew York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nitric Oxide (NO) and Hydrogen Sulfide (H

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsHumansHydrogen SulfideNeoplasmsNitric OxideOxidation-ReductionProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalS-NitrosothiolsAntineoplastic AgentsHydrogen SulfideNitric OxideS-Nitrosothiols

Identifiers

PMID30981679
PMCPMC6859576
OpenAlexW2935532533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.