Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30981201›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2019

Chemical mixtures and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of natural microbial community in the Tiber river.

Maria Ludovica Saccà, Valentina Elisabetta Viviana Ferrero, Robert Loos, Martina Di Lenola, Simona Tavazzi, Paola Grenni, Nicoletta Ademollo, Luisa Patrolecco, Jim Huggett, Anna Barra Caracciolo and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Development of Microbial Indicators in Ecological Systems.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maria Ludovica SaccàNational Research Council, Water Research Institute, Via Salaria km 29,300, 00015 9 Monterotondo, Rome, Italy.
Valentina Elisabetta Viviana FerreroMolecular and Cell Biology team, LGC, Queens Road, Teddington, Middlesex TW11 0LY, United Kingdom.
Robert LoosEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
Martina Di LenolaNational Research Council, Water Research Institute, Via Salaria km 29,300, 00015 9 Monterotondo, Rome, Italy.
Simona TavazziEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
Paola GrenniNational Research Council, Water Research Institute, Via Salaria km 29,300, 00015 9 Monterotondo, Rome, Italy.
Nicoletta AdemolloNational Research Council, Water Research Institute, Via Salaria km 29,300, 00015 9 Monterotondo, Rome, Italy.
Luisa PatroleccoNational Research Council, Water Research Institute, Via Salaria km 29,300, 00015 9 Monterotondo, Rome, Italy.
Jim HuggettMolecular and Cell Biology team, LGC, Queens Road, Teddington, Middlesex TW11 0LY, United Kingdom; School of Biosciences & Medicine, Faculty of Health & Medical Science, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
Anna Barra CaraccioloNational Research Council, Water Research Institute, Via Salaria km 29,300, 00015 9 Monterotondo, Rome, Italy.
Teresa LettieriEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy. Electronic address: teresa.lettieri@ec.europa.eu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Water Framework Directive (WFD) regulates freshwater and coastal water quality assessment in Europe. Chemical and ecological water quality status is based on measurements of chemical pollutants in water and biota together with other indicators such as temperature, nutrients, species compositions (phytoplankton, microalgae, benthos and fish) and hydromorphological conditions. However, in the current strategy a link between the chemical and the ecological status is missing. In the present WFD, no microbiological indicators are foreseen for integrating the different anthropogenic pressures, including mixtures of chemicals, nutrients and temperature changes, to provide a holistic view of the freshwater ecosystem water quality. The main aim of this work was to evaluate if natural microbial populations can be valuable indicators of multiple stressors (e.g. chemical pollutants, temperature, nutrients etc.) to guide preventive and remediation actions by water authorities. A preliminary survey was conducted to identify four sites reflecting a contamination gradient from the source to the mouth of a river suitable to the objectives of the European Marie Curie project, MicroCoKit. The River Tiber (Italy) was selected as a pilot case study to investigate the correlation between bacteria taxa and the chemical status of the river. The main physicochemical parameters, inorganic elements, organic pollutants and natural microbial community composition were assessed at four selected sites corresponding to pristine, agricultural, industrial and urban areas for three consecutive years. The overall chemical results indicated a correspondence between different groups of contaminants and the main contamination sources at the selected sampling points. Phylogenetic analysis of the microbial community analyzed by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization method (FISH) revealed differences among the four sampling sites which could reflect an adaptive bacterial response to the different anthropogenic pressures.

Indexed as

In Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMicrobiotaWater MicrobiologyBiotaEnvironmental MonitoringItalyPhytoplanktonRiversAnthropogenic pollution and stressorsBioindicatorsFreshwaterMicrobial populationsWater quality

Identifiers

PMID30981201
PMCPMC6509555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.