Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30980615›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2019

Impact of updated pediatric hypertension guidelines on progression from elevated blood pressure to hypertension in a community-based primary care population.

Elyse O Kharbanda, Steve E Asche, Steven P Dehmer, Alan R Sinaiko, Heidi L Ekstrom, Nicole Trower, Patrick J O'Connor

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elyse O KharbandaHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0003-1806-6502
Steve E AscheHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Steven P DehmerHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Alan R SinaikoDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Heidi L EkstromHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Nicole TrowerHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Patrick J O'ConnorHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
HealthPartners · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

EHR-Based Clinical Decision Support to Improve BP Management in AdolescentsR01HL115082 · NHLBI · HEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE · PI KHARBANDA, ELYSE OLSHEN · 2012 to 2016
$2.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL115082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2017, definitions for pediatric hypertension were updated. A threshold of 130/80 mm Hg was introduced for stage 1 hypertension in adolescents, and children with obesity were removed from the reference population, lowering the 95th percentile, compared to the 2004 Fourth Report. The impact of these changes on care for youth with elevated blood pressure has not been well described. The objective of this study was to compare the 2017 and 2004 criteria for hypertension, evaluating how they impact estimates of risks for elevated blood pressure to progress to hypertension. Data came from youth 10-17 years of age with ≥2 elevated blood pressure measurements (≥90th percentile or ≥120/80 mm Hg) between 04/15/2014 and 04/14/2016 and three additional measurements over two subsequent years. Blood pressures were recorded in primary care practices within a large health system, as part of routine care. Rates of incident hypertension following persistent elevated blood pressure based on the 2017 guidelines vs the 2004 Fourth Report were compared. We found, among 2025 youth with persistent elevated blood pressure, 46% were female and mean age was 14.6 years. Over 2 years of follow-up, progression to hypertension occurred in 5.9% using the 2017 guidelines vs 1.1% using 2004 Fourth Report definitions. Using the 2017 criteria, progression was most common in older youth and those with obesity. In conclusion, for most youth, elevated blood pressure does not progress to hypertension within 2 years. However, progression from elevated blood pressure to hypertension was more than 5-fold greater when applying the 2017 guidelines compared to the older 2004 Fourth Report criteria.

Indexed as

AdolescentBlood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationBody Mass IndexChildDisease ProgressionFemaleGuidelines as TopicHumansHypertensionIncidenceMaleObesityPrimary Health CareRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorspediatricsprimary care issuestreatment and diagnosis/guidelines

Identifiers

PMID30980615
PMCPMC6504565
OpenAlexW2938311976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.