Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30980566›Full record

ArticleIndoor air2019

Impacts of indoor surface finishes on bacterial viability.

Jinglin Hu, Sarah Ben Maamar, Adam J Glawe, Neil Gottel, Jack A Gilbert, Erica M Hartmann

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indoor air, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The indoors microbiome and human health.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Implications of indoor microbial ecology and evolution on antibiotic resistance.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jinglin HuDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0002-3291-6772
Sarah Ben MaamarDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0002-0262-850X
Adam J GlaweDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
Neil GottelDepartment of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Jack A GilbertDepartment of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0001-7920-7001
Erica M HartmannDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0002-0966-2014
Northwestern University · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

Technology CoreU19AI135964 · NIAID · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI ALAN R HAUSER · 2018 to 2026
$24.7M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI135964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbes in indoor environments are constantly being exposed to antimicrobial surface finishes. Many are rendered non-viable after spending extended periods of time under low-moisture, low-nutrient surface conditions, regardless of whether those surfaces have been amended with antimicrobial chemicals. However, some microorganisms remain viable even after prolonged exposure to these hostile conditions. Work with specific model pathogens makes it difficult to draw general conclusions about how chemical and physical properties of surfaces affect microbes. Here, we explore the survival of a synthetic community of non-model microorganisms isolated from built environments following exposure to three chemically and physically distinct surface finishes. Our findings demonstrated the differences in bacterial survival associated with three chemically and physically distinct materials. Alkaline clay surfaces select for an alkaliphilic bacterium, Kocuria rosea, whereas acidic mold-resistant paint favors Bacillus timonensis, a Gram-negative spore-forming bacterium that also survives on antimicrobial surfaces after 24 hours of exposure. Additionally, antibiotic-resistant Pantoea allii did not exhibit prolonged retention on antimicrobial surfaces. Our controlled microcosm experiment integrates measurement of indoor chemistry and microbiology to elucidate the complex biochemical interactions that influence the indoor microbiome.

Indexed as

Environmental MicrobiologyMicrobial ViabilitySurface PropertiesActinobacteriaAir Pollution, IndoorAnti-Infective AgentsBacillusEnterococcus hiraeMicrobacteriumMicrobiotaMicrococcaceaeNorthwestern United StatesPaintPantoeaAnti-Infective Agentsantimicrobial resistanceantimicrobial surface paintbacterial viabilityefficacy of antimicrobial productsindoor microbiomesporulation

Identifiers

PMID30980566
PMCPMC6851865
OpenAlexW2940308450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.