Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30980516›Full record

ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2019

Diversity of dermal fibroblasts as major determinant of variability in cell reprogramming.

Anna Maria Sacco, Immacolata Belviso, Veronica Romano, Antonia Carfora, Fabrizio Schonauer, Daria Nurzynska, Stefania Montagnani, Franca Di Meglio, Clotilde Castaldo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna Maria SaccoDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Immacolata BelvisoDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Veronica RomanoDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Antonia CarforaDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Fabrizio SchonauerDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Daria NurzynskaDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Stefania MontagnaniDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Franca Di MeglioDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Clotilde CastaldoDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1475-5036
Federico II University Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are adult somatic cells genetically reprogrammed to an embryonic stem cell-like state. Notwithstanding their autologous origin and their potential to differentiate towards cells of all three germ layers, iPSC reprogramming is still affected by low efficiency. As dermal fibroblast is the most used human cell for reprogramming, we hypothesize that the variability in reprogramming is, at least partially, because of the skin fibroblasts used. Human dermal fibroblasts harvested from five different anatomical sites (neck, breast, arm, abdomen and thigh) were cultured and their morphology, proliferation, apoptotic rate, ability to migrate, expression of mesenchymal or epithelial markers, differentiation potential and production of growth factors were evaluated in vitro. Additionally, gene expression analysis was performed by real-time PCR including genes typically expressed by mesenchymal cells. Finally, fibroblasts isolated from different anatomic sites were reprogrammed to iPSCs by integration-free method. Intriguingly, while the morphology of fibroblasts derived from different anatomic sites differed only slightly, other features, known to affect cell reprogramming, varied greatly and in accordance with anatomic site of origin. Accordingly, difference also emerged in fibroblasts readiness to respond to reprogramming and ability to form colonies. Therefore, as fibroblasts derived from different anatomic sites preserve positional memory, it is of great importance to accurately evaluate and select dermal fibroblast population prior to induce reprogramming.

Indexed as

Cellular ReprogrammingAbdomenAdultApoptosisBreastCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCells, CulturedFemaleFibroblastsHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem CellsNeckSkinThighcell reprogrammingfibroblastinduced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs)mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)

Identifiers

PMID30980516
PMCPMC6533477
OpenAlexW2940084731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.