Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30980338›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2019

The neural representation of mental beliefs held by two agents.

Ceylan Özdem, Marcel Brass, Arjen Schippers, Laurens Van der Cruyssen, Frank Van Overwalle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. One step too far: social cerebellum in norm-violating navigation.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  4. Mind your step: social cerebellum in interactive navigation.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. The posterior cerebellum supports implicit learning of social belief sequences.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ceylan ÖzdemDepartment of Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, B - 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Marcel BrassUniversity of Ghent & Ghent Institute for Functional and Metabolic Imaging, Ghent, Belgium.
Arjen SchippersDepartment of Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, B - 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Laurens Van der CruyssenDepartment of Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, B - 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Frank Van OverwalleDepartment of Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, B - 1050, Brussels, Belgium. Frank.VanOverwalle@vub.ac.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroimaging research has demonstrated that mentalizing about false beliefs held by other people recruits the temporo-parietal junction (TPJ). However, earlier work was limited to a single agent that held a false belief. We investigated the effect of two agents that held similar or mixed false and/or true beliefs. Participants saw animated stories with two smurfs holding true or false beliefs (Story phase). At the end of each trial, they were requested to take the perspective of the self or one of the smurfs (Question phase). We predicted that an increasing number of smurfs holding a false belief would increase activation in the TPJ when participants have to report the belief of the smurf, because the incongruent belief should have a stronger influence if it is held by two compared with one agent. This prediction was confirmed as activation in the TPJ during the Story and Question phase increased when more smurfs held a false belief. Taking the perspective of the self led to stronger activation of the TPJ in the two conditions that involved a true belief and weakest activation in the condition of two false beliefs. These data suggest that activation in TPJ depends on the perspective participants take, and that the number of agents holding a false belief influences activation in the TPJ only when taking the agent's perspective.

Indexed as

CultureAdolescentAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuroimagingParietal LobePhotic StimulationTemporal LobeYoung AdultPerspective takingSocial mentalizingTemporo-parietal junctionTheory of Mind

Identifiers

PMID30980338
PMCPMC6861364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.