ArticleMolecular biology reports2019
Efficient episomal gene transfer to human hepatic cells using the pFAR4-S/MAR vector.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Gene Therapy for Hemophilia: Projecting the Perspectives.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- Article
- Episomes and Transposases-Utilities to Maintain Transgene Expression from Nonviral Vectors.Genes · 2022Review
- Advances in the Development and the Applications of Nonviral, Episomal Vectors for Gene Therapy.Human gene therapy · 2021Article
- Novel vectors and approaches for gene therapy in liver diseases.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2021Review
- Viral Vector Systems for Gene Therapy: A Comprehensive Literature Review of Progress and Biosafety Challenges.Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association · 2020Review
- Episomal vectors based on S/MAR and the β-globin Replicator, encoding a synthetic transcriptional activator, mediate efficient γ-globin activation in haematopoietic cells.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Liver-directed gene therapy, using mainly viral vectors for the genetic cell modification, is a promising therapeutic approach for many genetic and metabolic liver diseases. The recent successful preclinical trials with AAV vectors expose the benefits as well as the limitations of the system. We focused on the development of an alternative non-viral episomal gene transfer system, by inserting the DNA element Scaffold/Matrix Attachment Region (S/MAR) into the free of antibiotic resistance gene miniplasmid vector (pFAR4). We produced pFAR4 derivative experimental vectors, carrying the eGFP gene driven by the composite HCRHPi liver-specific promoter and either lacking (pFAR4-noS/MAR) or containing the S/MAR element in an upstream (pFAR-S/MAR-IN) or downstream (pFAR4-S/MAR-OUT) configuration in relation to the poly-A signal of the eGFP expression cassette. Upon transfer into Huh7 cells by lipofection, vector pFAR4-S/MAR IN showed significantly higher transfection efficiency and eGFP expression than the control vector or the pFAR4-S/MAR-OUT (p < 0.005), estimated by fluorescent microscopy and flow cytometry. Stable transfections were produced only with cultures containing vector pFAR4-S/MAR IN, through the expansion of single colonies, which displayed sustained GFP expression and plasmid copy number per cell of 2.3 ± 0.4, at 3 months of culture. No vector integration events were detected in these cultures by FISH analysis, while the presence of free, circular plasmids was documented by plasmid rescue assay. The presence of S/MAR renders pFAR4 miniplasmid substantially more efficient regarding episomal gene transfer and is suitable for liver-directed studies towards gene therapy applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30980265What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.