ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2019
[Modern nephrolithiasis in the complex setting of metaphylaxis : Latest epidemiological data and a nationwide survey in private practices].
Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The focus of this work is on aspects of the current management of recurrent nephrolithiasis in private practices and outpatient departments in Germany. We wanted to make a contribution to the epidemiological discourse as well as for an instrument for the self-reflection and complex classification of urolithiasis in everyday practice by a first-time determination of population-based, age- and gender-based data based on the full recording of urological diagnoses and treatments in the federal accounting setting. The analysis of the taken positions in this representative practice survey prove to some extent information and experience deficits in the handling of complicated nephrolithiasis. Therefor more than 90% of the interviewees demand a structured practical training initiative. In this context, nearly 65% of practices also support the establishment of regional consultation hours. A majority strongly welcomes the establishment of a National Register of Urolithiasis, but nearly 40% are skeptical about defining pending framework conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30980089What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.